Reference health
Organ Donation under Oath
37/37 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
2 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 37 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.005
Experimental methods: When and why contextual instructions are important
resolves10.1186/1472-6963-8-235
The impact of donor policies in Europe: a steady increase, but not everywhere
resolves10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.008
Presumed Consent Legislation Failed to Improve Organ Donation in Chile
resolves10.4236/aa.2019.91001
The Political Ritual, the Party and the People: A Perspective on Sinicization of Marxism in the New Democratic Revolution
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.001
Organ donation in the lab: Preferences and votes on the priority rule
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.006
How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis
resolves10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00018.x
How Can People Be Induced to Willingly Change Their Behavior? The Path from Persuasive Communication to Binding Communication
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.08.009
Professional norms and physician behavior: Homo oeconomicus or homo hippocraticus?
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.006
Loopholes undermine donation: An experiment motivated by an organ donation priority loophole in Israel
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.10.006
Removing financial barriers to organ and bone marrow donation: The effect of leave and tax legislation in the U.S.
resolves10.1257/jep.21.2.153
What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2011.06.002
Are experienced people affected by a pre-set default option—Results from a field experiment
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.007
Increasing organ donation via changes in the default choice or allocation rule
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.010
Effect of persuasive messages on organ donation decisions: An experimental test
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.021
Remedying adverse selection in donor-priority rule using freeze period: Theory and experiment
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.007
The effects of extreme rituals on moral behavior: The performers-observers gap hypothesis
resolves10.1353/bsp.2019.0005
Does changing defaults save lives? Effects of presumed consent organ donation policies
The 2 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedOrgan donation with vouchers
no DOI — not checkedref32
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4174024"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4174024/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4174024)