Reference health
Investment managers' disclosures at investment conferences: Buzz vs. credibility
72/72 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
24 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 72 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/S0022109013000483
Why Do Hedge Funds Avoid Disclosure? Evidence from Confidential 13F Filings
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.02.004
A unique view of hedge fund derivatives usage: Safeguard or speculation?
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm079
All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00406.x
Will Women Be Women? Analyzing the Gender Difference among Financial Experts
resolves10.2307/2118369
Using Privileged Information to Manipulate Markets: Insiders, Gurus, and Credibility
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01500.x
Do Hedge Fund Managers Misreport Returns? Evidence from the Pooled Distribution
resolves10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.25
How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations?
resolves10.1007/s11142-012-9216-5
Do sell-side analysts exhibit differential target price forecasting ability?
resolves10.1111/1475-679X.12245
The Effects of Analyst‐Country Institutions on Biased Research: Evidence from Target Prices
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00593
An Empirical Analysis of Analysts' Target Prices: Short‐term Informativeness and Long‐term Dynamics
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.06.002
The activities of buy-side analysts and the determinants of their stock recommendations
resolves10.2307/2672914
Corporate Disclosure Practices, Institutional Investors, and Stock Return Volatility
resolves10.1086/426699
The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest
resolves10.1086/656252
When Sunlight Fails to Disinfect: Understanding the Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00438
Leaning for the Tape: Evidence of Gaming Behavior in Equity Mutual Funds
resolves10.1016/j.qref.2009.02.002
Put your money where your mouth is: Do financial firms follow their own recommendations?
resolves10.1007/s11142-019-09524-w
Sleeping with the enemy: should investment banks be allowed to engage in prop trading?
resolves10.1007/s11142-013-9259-2
Does the midpoint of range earnings forecasts represent managers’ expectations?
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.03.005
Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research
resolves10.3917/fina.411.0053
A re-examination of analysts’ differential target price forecasting ability
resolves10.1086/422982
Copycat Funds: Information Disclosure Regulation and the Returns to Active Management in the Mutual Fund Industry
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2024.101588
Shaping collective action in financial markets through popular expertise: An analysis of Due Diligence posts on WallStreetBets
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01142.x
Valuation Model Use and the Price Target Performance of Sell‐Side Equity Analysts*
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhq087
When Do Banks Listen to Their Analysts? Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002
Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting
resolves10.1111/fmii.12142
Changes in trading behavior of analyst‐affiliated institutions: the impact of the global analyst research settlement
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.010
Flying under the radar: The effects of short-sale disclosure rules on investor behavior and stock prices
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
resolves10.1007/s11142-017-9413-3
The best of all possible worlds: unraveling target price optimism using analysts’ scenario-based valuations
resolves10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17
Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2009.05.001
Disclosing conflicts of interest – Do experience and reputation matter?
resolves10.1017/S002210900999024X
Conflicts of Interest in the Stock Recommendations of Investment Banks and Their Determinants
resolves10.2308/accr-50576
The Role of Dissemination in Market Liquidity: Evidence from Firms' Use of Twitter™
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhu001
Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted Through Social Media
The 24 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedDisclosure processing costs, investors' information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedThe dark side of investor conferences: Evidence of managerial opportunism
no DOI — not checkedThe influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior
no DOI — not checkedDo institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value?
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedMitigating the influence of analysts who issue aggressive stock price targets: The role of joint versus separate evaluation
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedAn analysis of the recommendations of the "superstar" money managers at Barron's annual roundtable
no DOI — not checkedFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
no DOI — not checkedFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
no DOI — not checkedMutual fund shareholder letters: Flows, performance, and managerial behavior
no DOI — not checkedWhy do investors rely on low-quality investment advice? Experimental evidence from social media platforms
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedTen of nation's top investment firms settle enforcement actions involving conflicts of interest between research and investment banking. Joint Press Release, SEC, New York Attorney General
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedThe arguments External_event (3.8%), Market_consolidation (3.3%), Analysts (2.6%), and Tangible_assets (2.6%) are associated with the highest abnormal returns. Only the argument Private (i.e., if the firm is likely to go private) is significantly associated with negative abnormal returns (-2.4%). In Panel B, I focus on the 18 arguments of short recommendations. The most frequent arguments are Profitability_issues (70 observations
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring investor attention using google search
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4235008"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4235008/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4235008)