Reference health
The Effect of Compassion Fade on Altruistic Behavior: Experimental Evidence For a Guilt Mitigation Account
46/46 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 46 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/1948550619837002
Turkers of the World Unite: Multilevel In-Group Bias Among Crowdworkers on Amazon Mechanical Turk
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.004
Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings
resolves10.1080/17524032.2017.1397039
The US News Media, Polarization on Climate Change, and Pathways to Effective Communication
resolves10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00059-5
Chapter 59 Self-centered Fairness in Games with More Than Two Players
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.006
Helping one or helping many? A theoretical integration and meta-analytic review of the compassion fade literature
resolves10.1037/a0021643
Escaping affect: How motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering.
resolves10.1017/S1930297500004009
Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
resolves10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001
oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments
resolves10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z
Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
resolves10.1257/aer.20141409
Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs about Others' Altruism
resolves10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
resolves10.1002/bdm.1789
Perceived Utility (not Sympathy) Mediates the Proportion Dominance Effect in Helping Decisions
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007
Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2018.09.012
The price elasticity of charitable giving: New experimental evidence
resolves10.1257/aer.100.4.1826
Self-Interest through Delegation: An Additional Rationale for the Principal-Agent Relationship
resolves10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
resolves10.1007/s11229-015-0985-9
Ordering effects, updating effects, and the specter of global skepticism
resolves10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences
resolves10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.006
We need climate change mitigation and climate change mitigation needs the ‘We’: a state-of-the-art review of social identity effects motivating climate change action
resolves10.3390/g2010114
Do I Really Want to Know? A Cognitive Dissonance-Based Explanation of Other-Regarding Behavior
resolves10.1007/BF01068419
A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001
Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior
resolves10.1017/S1930297500000061
“If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedMotivated Errors
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedUsing charity performance metrics as an excuse not to give
no DOI — not checkedReplication with MTurk of the experimental design by
no DOI — not checkedSelf-image and strategic ignorance in moral dilemmas
no DOI — not checkedA simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedNo Harm Done? An Experimental Approach to the Nonidentity Problem
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedConsistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior
no DOI — not checkedFairness in extended dictator game experiments
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedSpontaneous giving and calculated greed
no DOI — not checkedCognitive Flexibility or Moral Commitment? Evidence of Anticipated Belief Distortion
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedCompassion Fade: Affect and Charity Are Greatest for a Single Child in Need
no DOI — not checkedref65
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4301600"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4301600/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4301600)