Reference health
Democratic Erosion and the United States Supreme Court
1/1 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
59 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 1 checked reference that resolves
The 59 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedOn Democratic Backsliding
no DOI — not checkedobserving that the literature has "generally fail[ed] to find a relationship between inequality and democratic transitions
no DOI — not checkedWhat Makes Democracies Endure?
no DOI — not checkedAccord Robert Andersen, Support for Democracy in Cross-National Perspective: The Detrimental Effect of Economic Inequality, 30 RSCH
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedArgument Preview: Justices to Hear Argument in Appointments Clause Dispute Arising from Puerto Rico Debt Crisis
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedRather than adopt a new broad rule and indeterminate exceptions, I would stick with the approach that I believe the Court's case law sets forth
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedBroadly, wage theft is when your employer doesn
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedThe New Lochner
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedThe Deregulatory First Amendment at Work, 51 HARV. C.R.-C
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedinteractive communication concerning political change" as "core political speech" for which "First Amendment protection . . . is at its zenith
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedat 48 (involving third-party tort liability for protest organizer)
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedat 2379-80 (citing California state law requiring disclosure to state office of tax form identifying top donors of charitable organizations)
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedThe cases that relied upon framing government regulation of some sort as compelled speech are this one as well as Janus and 303 Creative
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedcentered on the question of mootness and simply assumed for the sake of the appeal that there had in fact been a First Amendment violation. It is thus excluded from the remainder of the analysis in this Section. In Uzuegbunam, the Court held for the speaker in deciding that his request for nominal damages was sufficient to satisfy the redressability prong of the standing analysis
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedAPPENDIX: LIST OF CASES BY CATEGORY ELECTORAL RULES Participation Husted v. A
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checked* FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate, 142 S.Ct. 1638 (2022) * Other: Challenge to Electoral College Procedure Chiafalo v. Washington, 140 S.Ct
no DOI — not checkedSouthwest Airlines v. Saxon, 142 S.Ct. 1783 (2022) Viking River Cruises v. Moriana, 142 S.Ct. 1906 (2022) Wage Disputes: Other Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 138 S.Ct. 1134 (2018) Parker Drilling Management Services v. Newton, 139 S.Ct
no DOI — not checkedUzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 141 S.Ct. 792 (2021) Shurtleff v. City of Boston, 142 S.Ct. 1583 (2022) Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 142 S.Ct. 2407 (2022) Other Matal v
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4398320"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4398320/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4398320)