Reference health
Understanding Fairness Perceptions in Demographic Segmentation and Targeting
74/74 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
24 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 74 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1207/S15327663JCP0903_1
Nontarget Markets and Viewer Distinctiveness: The Impact of Target Marketing on Advertising Attitudes
resolves10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005
Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness
resolves10.1177/00222429241276529
AI–Human Hybrids for Marketing Research: Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) as Collaborators
resolves10.1093/jcr/ucab057
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the
<i>Journal of Consumer Research</i>
: A Curation and Research Agenda
resolves10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_11
Outraged Consumers: Getting Even at the Expense of Getting a Good Deal
resolves10.1086/674870
The Red Sneakers Effect: Inferring Status and Competence from Signals of Nonconformity
resolves10.1177/00222437211069093
The Bulletproof Glass Effect: Unintended Consequences of Privacy Notices
resolves10.1300/J134v07n03_03
Predicting Support for Welfare Policies: The Impact of Attributions and Beliefs About Inequality
resolves10.1108/10610429910266995
PRICING STRATEGY & PRACTICE“Why did you do that?” The important role of inferred motive in perceptions of price fairness
resolves10.1177/00222429241268634
Is This for Me? Differential Responses to Skin Tone Inclusivity Initiatives by Underrepresented Consumers and Represented Consumers
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.012
Why do Americans believe in economic mobility? Economic inequality, external attributions of wealth and poverty, and the belief in economic mobility
resolves10.1073/pnas.1805363115
Field studies of psychologically targeted ads face threats to internal validity
resolves10.1287/mksc.2023.0269
Frontiers: Shrinkflation Aversion: When and Why Product Size Decreases Are Seen as More Unfair than Equivalent Price Increases
resolves10.1016/j.bushor.2022.09.005
Embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI): Considerations and opportunities for brand managers
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
resolves10.1086/209228
Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information
resolves10.1086/711850
Pricing Fairness in a Pandemic: Navigating Unintended Changes to Value or Cost
resolves10.1086/663777
Consumer Response to Versioning: How Brands’ Production Methods Affect Perceptions of Unfairness
resolves10.1177/002224377801500208
An Application of Equity Theory to Buyer-Seller Exchange Situations
resolves10.1093/jcr/ucy039
Why Am I Seeing This Ad? The Effect of Ad Transparency on Ad Effectiveness
resolves10.1509/jmr.11.0503
When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising
resolves10.1016/j.jcps.2017.04.001
Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior
resolves10.1016/j.jretai.2019.09.004
The Price of Power: How Firm’s Market Power Affects Perceived Fairness of Price Increases
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<405::AID-EJSP997>3.0.CO;2-U
Folk conceptions of fairness and unfairness
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80007-7
Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances
resolves10.1086/677841
When Going Green Backfires: How Firm Intentions Shape the Evaluation of Socially Beneficial Product Enhancements
resolves10.1086/209223
Equity and Disconfirmation Perceptions as Influences on Merchant and Product Satisfaction
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
resolves10.3758/s13423-017-1312-x
What matters when judging intentionality—moral content or normative status? Testing the rational scientist model of the side-effect
resolves10.1007/s11747-022-00883-6
Advancing customer diversity, equity, and inclusion: Measurement, stakeholder influence, and the role of marketing
resolves10.1177/0190272519865502
The Influence of Incidental Tokenism on Private Evaluations of Stereotype-Typifying Products
resolves10.1016/j.jcps.2016.08.005
Stratification and segmentation: Social class in consumer behavior
resolves10.1177/002224299706100301
Ethics and Target Marketing: The Role of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes.
resolves10.1509/jmr.12.0420
Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression
resolves10.1086/209366
The Role of Labeling Processes in Elderly Consumers' Responses to Age Segmentation Cues
resolves10.1037/pspi0000383
What counts as discrimination? How principles of merit shape fairness of demographic decisions.
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.003
Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect
resolves10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies
resolves10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013
Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature
resolves10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.004
Enticing for me but unfair to her: Can targeted pricing evoke socially conscious behavior?
resolves10.1177/00222437221124857
Does Company Size Shape Product Quality Inferences? Larger Companies Make Better High-Tech Products, but Smaller Companies Make Better Low-Tech Products
resolves10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733
The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions
resolves10.1093/jcr/ucy042
No Small Matter: How Company Size Affects Consumer Expectations and Evaluations
The 24 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBand-Aid will make black and brown flesh-toned bandages
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedI know what you're doing and why you're doing it
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedHighlighting opportunities (versus outcomes) increases support for economic redistribution
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedThe weight of history: When historical corporate transgressions affect present-day consumer attitudes
no DOI — not checkedPerceptions of fair pricing
no DOI — not checkedAuditing for discrimination in algorithms delivering job ads
no DOI — not checkedBeyond skepticism: Can accessing persuasion knowledge bolster credibility?
no DOI — not checkedMeta plans to remove thousands of sensitive ad-targeting categories
no DOI — not checkedFairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedLady Doritos'? Pepsi wants a do-over
no DOI — not checkedDifferent Ads, Different Ethnicities, Same Car
no DOI — not checkedFacebook's optimization algorithms are highly unlikely to explain the effects of psychological targeting
no DOI — not checkedWhy marketers are returning to traditional advertising
no DOI — not checkedGender-based pricing in consumer packaged goods: A pink tax?
no DOI — not checkedNo time to buy": Asking consumers to spend time to save money is perceived as fairer than asking them to spend money to save time
no DOI — not checkedWhen diversity backfires: The asymmetric role of multicultural diversity on brand perception
no DOI — not checkedIntersectionality in marketing: A paradigm for understanding understudied consumers
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedTis better to give than receive? How and when gender and residencebased segments predict choice of donation-versus discount-based promotions
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4436508"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4436508/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4436508)