Reference health
Competitiveness and Employability
33/33 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.p20171019
No Gender Difference in Willingness to Compete When Competing against Self
resolves10.1126/science.1211180
Affirmative Action Policies Promote Women and Do Not Harm Efficiency in the Laboratory
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2018.10.003
Gender differences in interpersonal and intrapersonal competitive behavior
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2018.08.022
The entitlement effect in the ultimatum game – does it even exist?
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.028
Measuring preferences for competition with experimentally-validated survey questions
resolves10.1093/jeea/jvaa033
Distributional Preferences in Larger Groups: Keeping up with the Joneses and Keeping Track of the Tails
resolves10.1086/701681
Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study
resolves10.1080/19406940.2017.1359648
The impact of engagement in sport on graduate employability: implications for higher education policy and practice
resolves10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.014
Selection into self-improvement and competition pay: Gender, stereotypes, and earnings volatility
resolves10.1257/aer.20130360
How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1602
How Costly Is Diversity? Affirmative Action in Light of Gender Differences in Competitiveness
resolves10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004
The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments
resolves10.1080/01930826.2020.1773716
Maintaining Performance and Employee Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic
resolves10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations
resolves10.1007/BF03395647
Performance under Competitive and Self-Competitive Fixed-Interval Schedules of Reinforcement
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2014.1981
Gender Differences in the Willingness to Compete Emerge Early in Life and Persist
resolves10.1093/jeea/jvac031
Gender Differences in Tournament Choices: Risk Preferences, Overconfidence, or Competitiveness?
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCompete with others? No, thanks. With myself? Yes, please!
no DOI — not checkedThe gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations
no DOI — not checkedWriting a Winning Cover Letter
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedMake your Cover Letter and CV Stand Out
no DOI — not checkedThe Competitiveness Questionnaire: A Measure of Two Components of Competitiveness
no DOI — not checkedMindsets about Remote Work Predict Employee Well-Being in Home Office: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedCan Simple Advice Eliminate the Gender Difference in Willingness to Compete?
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedThe competitive attitude scale (CAS): a multidimensional measure of competitiveness in adolescence
no DOI — not checkedGender
no DOI — not checkedThe Four Faces of Competition: The Development of the Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory
no DOI — not checkedTaste for Competition and the Gender Gap among Young Business Professionals
no DOI — not checkedSelf-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedAppendices We provide two appendices
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462711"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462711/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462711)