Reference health

Strategy-Proofness in Private Good Economies with Linear Preferences: An Impossibility Result

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4462724
CiteStamped reference-health badge
11/11 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 11 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0169-7218(10)00025-0
Strategyproof Social Choice
resolves10.2307/1914083
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
resolves10.1007/s00355-007-0289-1
Strategy-proofness versus efficiency on the Cobb-Douglas domain of exchange economies
resolves10.1007/s00199-012-0724-0
Egalitarian division under Leontief Preferences
resolves10.1007/s00355-011-0643-1
Note on social choice allocation in exchange economies with Cobb–Douglas preferences
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2
Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
resolves10.2307/2297198
Strategy-Proof Allocation Mechanisms at Differentiable Points
resolves10.1007/s003550050050
Strategy-proofness versus efficiency on restricted domains of exchange economies
resolves10.1006/jeth.2002.2940
Inefficiency of Strategy-Proof Rules for Pure Exchange Economies
resolves10.1007/s00355-016-0987-7
Non-bossiness
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(90)90070-Z
On a conjecture by gale about one-sided matching problems
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedEfficiency and truthfulness with Leontief preferences. A note on two-agent, two-good economies
no DOI — not checkedStrategy-proof and efficient exchange on Cobb-Douglas utility functions
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462724"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462724/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462724/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4462724)