Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/rode.12271REDD+ as Result‐based Aid: General Lessons and Bilateral Agreements of Norway
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101277Revisiting the location bias and additionality of REDD+ projects: the role of project proponents status and certification
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.021The politics and performativity of REDD+ reference levels: Examining the Guyana-Norway agreement and its implications for ‘offsetting’ towards ‘net zero’
resolves10.1080/13658811003752332Predictive ability of logistic regression, auto-logistic regression and neural network models in empirical land-use change modeling – a case study
resolves10.1080/1747423X.2017.1410242Uncertainty in establishing forest reference levels and predicting future forest-based carbon stocks for REDD+
resolves10.1007/s10745-013-9613-9Land-use Change Modeling in a Brazilian Indigenous Reserve: Construction of a Reference Scenario for the Suruí REDD Project
resolves10.1073/pnas.2004334117Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon
resolves10.3389/ffgc.2020.00011REDD+ in Theory and Practice: How Lessons From Local Projects Can Inform Jurisdictional Approaches
The 35 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedDeforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies? Environ
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedSystematic over-crediting in California's forest carbon offsets program
no DOI — not checkedThe return of carbon offsetting? The discursive legitimation of new market arrangements in the Paris climate regime
no DOI — not checkedNational and subnational forest conservation policies?What works, what doesn't
no DOI — not checkedComparing methods for assessing the effectiveness of subnational REDD plus initiatives
no DOI — not checkedDo carbon offsets offset carbon? SSRN Electron
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedMarkets in Motion: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2021
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedA global evaluation of the effectiveness of voluntary REDD+ projects at reducing deforestation and degradation in the moist tropics
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedShall the American Association of Geographers endorse carbon offsets? Absolutely not
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedThe "virtual economy" of REDD+ projects: does private certification of REDD+ projects ensure their environmental integrity? Int
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedTaskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets, 2021. Phase 1-Final Report
no DOI — not checkedVM0006 Methodology for Carbon Accounting for Mosaic and Landscapescale REDD Projects, v.2.2. Verra
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedJurisdictional and Nested REDD+ (JNR) Program Guide
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedClimatic benefits from the 2006-2017 avoided deforestation in Amazonian Brazil
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedBrazil's conservation reform and the reduction of deforestation in Amazonia
no DOI — not checkedComparison of spatial modelling frameworks for the identification of future afforestation in New Zealand
no DOI — not checkedThe Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project. San Francisco. Wildlife Works and ecoPartners
checked 2026-09-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.