Reference health
Striking a Balance: Exploring Regulatory Preferences and Trade-Offs in Marine Environmental Conservation of Mining Activities in Arctic Norway
45/45 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
24 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1006/jeem.1994.1017
Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003
The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00022-8
Information access, income distribution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_8
The Nussir Case and the Battle for Legitimacy: Scientific Assessments, Defining Power and Political Contestation
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.003
Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: Results from a discrete choice experiment
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644
The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender.
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.036
Integrating marine ecosystem conservation and ecosystems services economic valuation: Implications for coastal zones governance
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.018
A global renewable mix with proven technologies and common materials
resolves10.1515/2152-2812.1101
Accounting for Nonmarket Impacts in a Benefit-Cost Analysis of Underground Coal Mining in New South Wales, Australia
resolves10.1007/s10640-018-00311-w
Spatial Dimensions of Stated Preference Valuation in Environmental and Resource Economics: Methods, Trends and Challenges
resolves10.1017/S0954102013000308
Ecosystem services of the Southern Ocean: trade-offs in decision-making
resolves10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00084-7
Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values
resolves10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.03.001
Assessing development options in mining communities using stated preference techniques
resolves10.1007/s10640-011-9487-5
Attribute Framing in Choice Experiments: How Do Attribute Level Descriptions Affect Value Estimates?
resolves10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00088-1
Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical examples and issues for further action
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.026
Water resource management in New Zealand: Jobs or algal blooms?
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.013
Valuing the non-use benefits of marine conservation zones: An application to the UK Marine Bill
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121938
Estimations of utility function and values of sustainable mining via the choice experiment method
resolves10.1017/S1355770X04001718
Environmental values and resource management options: a choice modelling experience in Malaysia
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.097
Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving coastal and marine ecosystems
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00080-8
The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California
resolves10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113150
New insights into submarine tailing disposal for a reduced environmental footprint: Lessons learnt from Norwegian fjords
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.006
Testing attribute selection and variation in a choice experiment to assess the tradeoffs associated with increased mining development
resolves10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.047
Benthic community status and mobilization of Ni, Cu and Co at abandoned sea deposits for mine tailings in SW Norway
resolves10.1080/00036840801964633
Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data
resolves10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.10.016
Willingness to pay for ecosystem services of open oceans by choice-based conjoint analysis: A case study of Japanese residents
resolves10.5751/ES-04491-170122
Cumulative Effects Planning: Finding the Balance Using Choice Experiments
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157311
A generic environmental risk assessment framework for deep-sea tailings placement
resolves10.1177/0022242919825649
How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework
The 24 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedTesting the sensitivity of stated environmental preferences to variations in choice architecture
no DOI — not checkedAttribute Non-attendance in Environmental Discrete Choice Experiments: The Impact of Including an Employment Attribute
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedCopper Price Variation Forecasts Using Genetic Algorithms
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedEvidence of the impacts of metal mining and the effectiveness of mining mitigation measures on social-ecological systems in Arctic and boreal regions: a systematic map protocol
no DOI — not checkedApollo: a flexible, powerful and customizable freeware package for choice model estimation and application
no DOI — not checkedThe state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiment
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedWho cares and how much? Narrative for advances in aquatic ecosystem services through nonmarket valuation with spatial dimensions using a discrete choice experiment
no DOI — not checkedConservation reconsidered
no DOI — not checkedWaste sites from mines in Norwegian fjords
no DOI — not checkedComparison of Environmental Impacts of Deep-sea Tailings Placement Versus On-land Disposal
no DOI — not checkedHow to Advance Sustainable Mining
no DOI — not checkedConditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
no DOI — not checkedEcosystems and Human Wellbeing: Current States and Trends
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref69
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4482175"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4482175/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4482175)