Reference health

Investigating Fair Data Management Practices in Eu-Funded Agri-Food and Rural Development Multi-Actor Projects

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4524689
CiteStamped reference-health badge
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1145/3433148.3433155
The Philosopher's Corner
resolves10.1002/jsfa.9693
State‐of‐the‐art technologies in precision agriculture: a systematic review
resolves10.1093/aepp/ppx056
Big Data in Agriculture: A Challenge for the Future
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.014
Policy design for climate change mitigation and adaptation in sheep farming: Insights from a study of the knowledge transfer chain
resolves10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.011
Rural cooperatives in the digital age: An analysis of the Internet presence and degree of maturity of agri-food cooperatives' e-commerce
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103349
Multi-actor Horizon 2020 projects in agriculture, forestry and related sectors: A Multi-level Innovation System framework (MINOS) for identifying multi-level system failures
resolves10.3233/IP-170419
Advancing the EU data economy: Conditions for realizing the full potential of data reuse
resolves10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.002
Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: A review of knowledge and research needs
resolves10.1057/kmrp.2012.45
Knowledge objects as shared system representation
resolves10.1007/s41055-017-0011-7
Bridging the Divide between Theory and Practice: Taking a Co-Productive Approach to Vet-Farmer Relationships
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.014
Bridging collaboration gaps in fragmented environmental governance systems
resolves10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037
A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture
resolves10.1080/23251042.2015.1128055
Public awareness and perception of climate change: a quantitative cross-national study
resolves10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.019
Big data in agriculture: Does the new oil lead to sustainability?
resolves10.3390/su11051372
Food and Earth Systems: Priorities for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation for Agriculture and Food Systems
resolves10.1016/j.tplants.2018.11.007
Perspectives for Remote Sensing with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Precision Agriculture
resolves10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.005
Declarative or procedural knowledge? Knowledge for enhancing farmers’ mitigation and adaptation behaviour to climate change
resolves10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x
The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration
resolves10.1007/s11119-020-09759-7
The challenge of reproducing remote sensing data from satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the context of management zones and precision agriculture
resolves10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378314
An exploratory analysis on Agritech policies, innovations and funding for climate change mitigation
resolves10.24840/2183-0606_004.001_0008
Big Data: Fueling the Next Evolution of Agricultural Innovation
resolves10.3390/info10110348
Precision Agriculture: A Remote Sensing Monitoring System Architecture
resolves10.3389/frma.2018.00010
Openness and Impact of Leading Scientific Countries
resolves10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053654
Opportunities and Challenges for Big Data in Agricultural and Environmental Analysis
resolves10.1038/sdata.2016.18
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
resolves10.1038/sdata.2018.118
A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023
Big Data in Smart Farming – A review
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedEU Code of Conduct on Agricultural Data Sharing by Contractual Agreement
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedThe FAIR Data Principles [WWW Document]. FORCE11
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedEconomic, Ethical and Legal Aspects of Digitalization in the Agri-Food Sector
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedValue-based consumer segmentation: the key to sustainable agri-food chains
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedAgricultural science in the wild: A social network analysis of farmer knowledge exchange
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4524689"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4524689/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4524689/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4524689)