Reference health

Scared Away: Credit Demand Response to Expected Motherhood Penalty in the Labor Market

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4539887
CiteStamped reference-health badge
33/33 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-09

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?
resolves10.1257/aer.p20161034
Women on Boards in Finance and STEM Industries
resolves10.1353/sof.0.0252
Is There a Career Penalty for Mothers' Time Out? A Comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States
resolves10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30039-0
Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market
resolves10.1111/1475-6803.00041
Do Female Mutual Fund Managers Manage Differently?
resolves10.1111/geer.12052
Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform
resolves10.1111/jofi.13028
What Explains Differences in Finance Research Productivity during the Pandemic?
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1111/1467-9914.00185
The Efffect of Work Interruptions on Women’s Wages
resolves10.1016/j.labeco.2019.04.009
Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.034
Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations
resolves10.1086/511799
Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?
resolves10.1080/01621459.1997.10474041
Using Expectations Data to Study Subjective Income Expectations
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhs071
Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending
resolves10.1086/718964
When Harry Fired Sally: The Double Standard in Punishing Misconduct
resolves10.1257/jep.3.1.25
Women's Quest for Economic Equality
resolves10.1093/sf/sot092
What's So Special about STEM? A Comparison of Women's Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations
resolves10.1257/aer.90.4.715
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians
resolves10.3386/w26914
The Gender Gap in Housing Returns
resolves10.1177/0956797620943835
Polluted Psyche: Is the Effect of Air Pollution on Unethical Behavior More Physiological or Psychological?
resolves10.1086/719966
Labor Market Discrimination against Family Responsibilities: A Correspondence Study with Policy Change in China
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560
Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206
Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market
resolves10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200197
Intent to have a second child among Chinese women of childbearing age following China’s new universal two-child policy: a cross-sectional study
resolves10.1016/j.iref.2018.12.009
Two-child policy, gender income and fertility choice in China
resolves10.2307/2946676
Sex Discrimination in Restaurant Hiring: An Audit Study
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2939
Sex Matters: Gender Bias in the Mutual Fund Industry
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.04.050
The role of heterogeneous risk preferences, discount rates, and earnings expectations in college major choice
resolves10.1093/restud/rdad018
A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends
resolves10.1257/jep.12.1.137
Understanding the ‘Family Gap’ in Pay for Women with Children
resolves10.1086/660887
The Competitive Saving Motive: Evidence from Rising Sex Ratios and Savings Rates in China
resolves10.1177/00222437221117113
I Will Get a Reward, Too: When Disclosing the Referrer Reward Increases Referring
resolves10.1016/j.jce.2021.01.003
Gender discrimination in China: Experimental evidence from the job market for college graduates
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedThe motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedDynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors
no DOI — not checkedThe gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedGender gap in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from China
no DOI — not checkedPrenatal sex selection and missing girls in China: Evidence from the diffusion of diagnostic ultrasound
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedThe "missing girls" of China and the unintended consequences of the one child policy
no DOI — not checkedDesired fertility, realized fertility and the effects of china's universal two-child policy
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedFertility restrictions and life cycle outcomes: Evidence from the one-child policy in China
no DOI — not checkedThe child penalty atlas
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedAssociation of china's universal two child policy with changes in births and birth related health factors: national, descriptive comparative study
no DOI — not checkedWhat's in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper. com
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedMissing women
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans
no DOI — not checkedResearch on the burden of childbirth costs paid by enterprises and its countermeasures under the three-child policy: An analysis based on the extension of maternity leave
no DOI — not checkedHow do college students form expectations?
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4539887"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4539887/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4539887/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4539887)