Reference health
Do You Lose When You Sell Loose? Impact of Unpackaged Sales on Profit and Waste
32/32 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
38 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 32 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/msom.2021.1018
Shipment Policies for Products with Fixed Shelf Lives: Impact on Profits and Waste
resolves10.1111/poms.13191
Reducing Product Expiration by Aligning Salesforce Incentives: A Data‐driven Approach
resolves10.1287/mksc.1030.0022
A Choice Model for Packaged Goods: Dealing with Discrete Quantities and Quantity Discounts
resolves10.1080/08974438.2015.1110549
Consumer-Related Food Waste: Role of Food Marketing and Retailers and Potential for Action
resolves10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.013
Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.227
The prospects of zero-packaging grocery stores to improve the social and environmental impacts of the food supply chain
resolves10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.003
Quantifying the potential to improve on food waste, freshness and sales for perishables in supermarkets
resolves10.1016/j.jretai.2013.06.002
Consumer Response to Package Downsizing: Evidence from the Chicago Ice Cream Market
resolves10.1509/jmkr.46.6.739
Supersize in One Dimension, Downsize in Three Dimensions: Effects of Spatial Dimensionality on Size Perceptions and Preferences
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.01.004
Package size and price discrimination in the paper towel market
resolves10.1177/0038038511416150
Beyond the Throwaway Society: Ordinary Domestic Practice and a Sociological Approach to Household Food Waste
resolves10.1680/muen.2012.165.1.3
Domestic food waste – the carbon and financial costs of the options
resolves10.1086/296410
Why do Hot Dogs Come in Packs of 10 and Buns in 8s or 12s? A Demand-Side Investigation
resolves10.1287/mksc.1110.0657
Marketing of Vice Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Package Size Decision
resolves10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.013
Food loss rates at the food retail, influencing factors and reasons as a basis for waste prevention measures
resolves10.1098/rstb.2010.0126
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.003
Small is beautiful: The role of anticipated food waste in consumers’ avoidance of large packages
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.044
Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging
resolves10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.004
Food waste: The role of date labels, package size, and product category
resolves10.3390/su11010264
Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste: An Overview of Drivers and Issues
The 38 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedDrivers of product expiration in consumer packaged goods retailing
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedHow safe are self-serve unpackaged foods
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedSpain passes comprehensive waste reduction regulation, eases the way for reuse
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedConsumers' attitudes toward package size and price
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedWasted: How america is losing up to 40 percent of its food from farm to fork to landfill
no DOI — not checkedImproved ordering of perishables: The value of stock-age information
no DOI — not checkedGreening walmart: Progress and controversy
no DOI — not checkedConsumer attitudes' towards unpackaged foods
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedImpact of package elements on consumer's purchase decision
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedImpact of product packaging on consumers buying behavior: Evidence from karachi
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedThree essays on consumption and food waste
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedHousehold food and drink waste in the uk
no DOI — not checkedref69
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4585591"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4585591/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4585591)