Reference health
Area Conditions and Positive Incentives: Engaging Local Communities to Protect Forests
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
57 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3368/le.88.4.613
Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2927
An Analysis of Price vs. Revenue Protection: Government Subsidies in the Agriculture Industry
resolves10.1007/s10640-021-00563-z
Cooperative Management of Ecosystem Services: Coalition Formation, Landscape Structure and Policies
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100974
Community-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services (CB-PES): Implications of community involvement for program outcomes
resolves10.1023/B:EARE.0000017276.60009.bf
Hugging Trees: Claiming de Facto Property Rights by Blockading Resource Use
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.003
Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2020.3831
The Value and Cost of Crop Minimum Support Price: Farmer and Consumer Welfare and Implementation Cost
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.006
Deforestation, leakage and avoided deforestation policies: A spatial analysis
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
resolves10.3390/agriculture12071040
Using Conditional Cash Payments to Prevent Land-Clearing Fires: Cautionary Findings from Indonesia
resolves10.1287/msom.2019.0837
Cooperative Approaches to Managing Social Responsibility in a Market with Externalities
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.021
How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam's payments for Forest Environmental Services Program
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2018.3133
Socially Beneficial Rationality: The Value of Strategic Farmers, Social Entrepreneurs, and For-Profit Firms in Crop Planting Decisions
resolves10.5751/ES-13549-280113
Collective payments for ecosystem services: a counterpart of commodification and privatization trends in nature conservation?
resolves10.18352/ijc.438
Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services
resolves10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.12.003
Impact of Village Savings and Loan Associations: Evidence from a cluster randomized trial
resolves10.1287/msom.2022.0076
Agricultural Supply Chains in Emerging Markets: Competition and Cooperation Under Correlated Yields
resolves10.1287/msom.2016.0599
Information Provision Policies for Improving Farmer Welfare in Developing Countries: Heterogeneous Farmers and Market Selection
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2171
Milking the Quality Test: Improving the Milk Supply Chain Under Competing Collection Intermediaries
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.045
Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01393.x
Payments for Ecosystem Services as a Framework for Community‐Based Conservation in Northern Tanzania
resolves10.1287/msom.2018.0744
Ensuring Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Through Vertical Integration and Horizontal Sourcing
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach
resolves10.1287/msom.2018.0762
Operational and Financial Decisions Within Proportional Investment Cooperatives
resolves10.1287/msom.2022.1151
Contractual Coordination of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives With Quality Provisions
resolves10.2307/2233724
Risk, Implicit Contracts and the Family in Rural Areas of Low-Income Countries
resolves10.1007/s11625-014-0282-4
Climate change, cocoa migrations and deforestation in West Africa: What does the past tell us about the future?
resolves10.1073/pnas.2015171118
Satellite-based deforestation alerts with training and incentives for patrolling facilitate community monitoring in the Peruvian Amazon
resolves10.1111/poms.12161
Supply‐Chain Research Opportunities with the Poor as Suppliers or Distributors in Developing Countries
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.005
The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2018.3178
Manufacturers’ Competition and Cooperation in Sustainability: Stable Recycling Alliances
resolves10.1017/S0266466605050206
NONPARAMETRIC FRONTIER ESTIMATION: A CONDITIONAL QUANTILE-BASED APPROACH
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2014.07.006
Simulating potential growth and yield of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) with PALMSIM: Model description, evaluation and application
resolves10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165
Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data
The 57 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedSustainable sourcing of agricultural products: Fixed vs. flexible premiums
no DOI — not checkedGovernment interventions to promote agricultural innovation
no DOI — not checkedTip your farmer? implications of tipping in agriculture on sustainability and financial inclusion
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedSupply chain scheduling: Conflict and cooperation in assembly systems
no DOI — not checkedMigration and deforestation in Indonesia
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedLand tenure and payment for environmental services: Challenges and opportunities for redd+
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedImproving farmers' income on misc agri-platforms: Evidence from the field
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedDeforestation fronts: Drivers and responses in a changing world
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of input and output farm subsidies on farmer welfare, income disparity, and consumer surplus
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedby Proposition 2, ? would prevent deforestation with compensation for the instance with L, ? F and {(? , ? )} ?L if and only if (EC.59) holds and ? > ? for every ? L, which is equivalent to (EC.60) and ?i > ?i
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedPenduduk Indonesia menurut provinsi dan kabupaten
no DOI — not checkedAngka nasional hasil pencacahan lengkap
no DOI — not checkedTriple stm (sustainably sourced & supplied) principles & criteria -soy, south america to destination
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedCavally Forest Reserve Landscape
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedref86
no DOI — not checkedref87
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedMars aims to tackle "broken" cocoa model with new sustainability scheme
no DOI — not checkedExploring the design of jurisdictional redd+: The case of central kalimantan
no DOI — not checkedref91
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedref96
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref98
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedUnilever (2022a) Reimaging Landscapes
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedref103
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedEffectiveness, efficiency, and equity in jurisdictional redd+ benefit distribution mechanisms: Insights from jambi province
no DOI — not checkedref106
no DOI — not checkedref107
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4609761"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4609761/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4609761)