Reference health

Serious Errors Impair an Assessment of Forest Carbon Projects: A Rebuttal Of West Et Al. (2023)

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4661972
CiteStamped reference-health badge
11/11 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 11 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1126/science.ade3535
Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation
resolves10.1126/science.1244693
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/ac5669
How do REDD+ projects contribute to the goals of the Paris Agreement?
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/074002
Aboveground carbon loss in natural and managed tropical forests from 2000 to 2012
resolves10.1038/s41467-018-05386-z
Carbon losses from deforestation and widespread degradation offset by extensive growth in African woodlands
resolves10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program
resolves10.1111/cobi.13448
Statistical matching for conservation science
resolves10.1086/725051
What Drives and Stops Deforestation, Reforestation, and Forest Degradation? An Updated Meta-analysis
resolves10.1080/01621459.2021.1929245
The Augmented Synthetic Control Method
resolves10.1257/jel.20191450
Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects
resolves10.1038/s43247-023-01053-4
Protected areas reduce deforestation and degradation and enhance woody growth across African woodlands
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedRevealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest certifier are worthless, analysis shows
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedDisentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical de-forestation
no DOI — not checkedA global evaluation of the effectiveness of voluntary REDD projects at reducing deforestation and degradation in the moist tropics
no DOI — not checkedPredictive inference with the jackknife+
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checked3% Colombia 1389 -4,506.85 -3,019.10 -49% Colombia 1395 -582.62 -820.55 29% Colombia
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4661972"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4661972/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4661972/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4661972)