Reference health

Women in Economics: The Role of Gendered References at Entry in the Profession

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4688522
CiteStamped reference-health badge
31/31 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-04

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 31 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1073/pnas.2118853119
Underrepresentation of women in the economics profession more pronounced in the United States compared to heterogeneous Europe
resolves10.1257/aer.20141734
Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability
resolves10.1257/jep.30.4.221
Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104323
Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching
resolves10.1126/science.aal4230
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
resolves10.1093/qje/qjz035
Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?*
resolves10.1257/pandp.113.815
Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession
resolves10.3386/w28494
Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars
resolves10.1038/ngeo2819
Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience
resolves10.1111/0022-4537.00241
The Leadership Styles of Women and Men
resolves10.1093/ej/uead045
Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market
resolves10.1257/pandp.20211028
Gender Differences in Fields of Specialization and Placement Outcomes among PhDs in Economics
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.011
An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science
resolves10.1093/ej/ueac032
Publishing While Female: are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review
resolves10.1257/aer.97.2.422
Women Helping Women, Men Helping Women? Same-Gender Mentoring, Initial Job Placements, and Early Career Publishing Success for Economics PhDs
resolves10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057
Gender Similarities and Differences
resolves10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102212
Grading bias and the leaky pipeline in economics: Evidence from Stockholm University
resolves10.3386/w29436
Women in Science. Lessons from the Baby Boom
resolves10.1257/pandp.20211085
Gendered Citations at Top Economic Journals
resolves10.1177/0003122419877135
The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class through Word Embeddings
resolves10.1257/jep.33.1.3
Women in Economics: Stalled Progress
resolves10.1037/a0016539
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.
resolves10.2307/146320
Women Helping Women? Role Model and Mentoring Effects on Female Ph.D. Students in Economics
resolves10.1257/pandp.20211030
Field Specializations among Beginning Economists: Are There Gender Differences?
resolves10.1162/rest_a_01356
Does Economics Make You Sexist?
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0145146
Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study
resolves10.1257/aer.p20171126
Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia
resolves10.1086/711401
Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work
resolves10.1257/pandp.20211086
Confidence Men? Evidence on Confidence and Gender among Top Economists
resolves10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4
A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants
resolves10.1177/0957926503014002277
Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGender Attitudes in the Judiciary
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedPeer effects in graduate programmes
no DOI — not checkedVariation in women's success across phd programmes in economics
no DOI — not checkedImplicit Stereotypes: Evidence from Teachers' Gender Bias. The Quarterly
no DOI — not checkedLinguistic biases in letters of recommendation for radiation oncology residency applicants from 2015 to
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedA synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-55
no DOI — not checkedInstitutional racism: Judicial conduct and a new theory of racial discrimination
no DOI — not checkedEvidence for a Two-Women Quota in University Departments across Disciplines
no DOI — not checkedInnovative ideas and gender inequality
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedHome or away? Gender differences in the effects of an expansion of tertiary education supply. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 181, Bank of Italy
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4688522"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4688522/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4688522/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4688522)