Reference health
Consuming Values
47/47 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
29 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 47 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/S1931436100000298
French Wine and the U.S. Boycott of 2003: Does Politics Really Affect Commerce?
resolves10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y
Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions
resolves10.1108/SRJ-07-2019-0244
Shared social responsibility. Dual role of consumers as stakeholders in firm strategy
resolves10.1257/aer.20180615
Tax-Exempt Lobbying: Corporate Philanthropy as a Tool for Political Influence
resolves10.1515/bap-2016-0004
Avenues of influence: on the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2019.3562
The Demotivating Effects of Communicating a Social-Political Stance: Field Experimental Evidence from an Online Labor Market Platform
resolves10.1093/restud/rds012
Charity as a Substitute for Reputation: Evidence from an Online Marketplace
resolves10.1017/S0003055422001095
Collective Remembrance and Private Choice: German–Greek Conflict and Behavior in Times of Crisis
resolves10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.11.008
Does political conflict hurt trade? Evidence from consumer boycotts
resolves10.1177/0022243720947682
Should Your Brand Pick a Side? How Market Share Determines the Impact of Corporate Political Advocacy
resolves10.1007/s40547-019-00098-x
The Consumer Response to Corporate Political Advocacy: a Review and Future Directions
resolves10.1108/JPBM-03-2021-3404
The effect of corporate political advocacy on brand perception: an event study analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101811
How do consumers use ESG disclosure? Evidence from a randomized field experiment with everyday product purchases
resolves10.1287/mksc.2022.1386
Frontiers: Spilling the Beans on Political Consumerism: Do Social Media Boycotts and Buycotts Translate to Real Sales Impact?
resolves10.1142/S2737436X24500018
Discrimination in the Spotlight: The Effects of Political and Religious Bias on Consumer Behaviour and Labour Markets
resolves10.1017/bap.2020.5
Why Do Corporations Engage in LGBT Rights Activism? LGBT Employee Groups as Internal Pressure Groups
resolves10.1086/707491
Partisan Consumerism: Experimental Tests of Consumer Reactions to Corporate Political Activity
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00526
French Roast: Consumer Response to International Conflict—Evidence from Supermarket Scanner Data
resolves10.1287/mksc.2022.1408
Frontiers: Polarized America: From Political Polarization to Preference Polarization
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedPolitical speech from corporate America: Sparse, mostly for Democrats, and somewhat representative
no DOI — not checkedA positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance
no DOI — not checkedAdvertising and environmental stewardship: Evidence from the BP oil spill
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedComing apart? Cultural distances in the United States over time
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedThe moral preferences of investors: Experimental evidence
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedConsumer boycotts: The impact of the Iraq war on French wine sales in the US
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedXGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedThe political parties have sorted
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedThe social responsibility of business is to increase its profits
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedA Modigliani-Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility
no DOI — not checkedCompanies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedCapital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk
no DOI — not checkedAgency, information and corporate investment. Handbook of the Economics of Finance 1, 111-165. The Economist (2021a). An eco-wakening. The Economist. The Economist (2021b). The political CEO
no DOI — not checkedref76
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4855718"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4855718/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4855718)