Reference health
The Gender Disclosure Gap: Salary History Bans Unravel When Men Volunteer Their Income
58/58 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
30 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 58 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/qje/qjx028
Ban the Box, Criminal Records, and Racial Discrimination: A Field Experiment*
resolves10.1287/orsc.1120.0757
Do Women Choose Different Jobs from Men? Mechanisms of Application Segregation in the Market for Managerial Workers
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001
Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask
resolves10.1177/0001839216682728
Leaning Out: How Negative Recruitment Experiences Shape Women’s Decisions to Compete for Executive Roles
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104890
The salary taboo privacy norms and the diffusion of information
resolves10.1086/684911
An “Opposing Responses” Test of Classic versus Market-Based Promotion Tournaments
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2315
Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs
resolves10.1287/orsc.2018.1249
Gender and Organization Science: Introduction to a Virtual Special Issue
resolves10.1287/orsc.2022.1635
Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines
resolves10.1093/restud/rdu030
Do Competitive Workplaces Deter Female Workers? A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment on Job Entry Decisions
resolves10.1086/261826
Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1287/orsc.1090.0508
Women's and Men's Career Referents: How Gender Composition and Comparison Level Shape Career Expectations
resolves10.1086/466995
The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality
resolves10.5465/AMBPP.2020.205
Entrepreneurship as a Response to Labor Market Discrimination for Formerly Incarcerated People
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2014.1994
Do Women Avoid Salary Negotiations? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
resolves10.1086/467468
The Impact of Mandatory Disclosure Laws on Product Choices: An Analysis of the Salad Dressing Market
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2021.4077
Missing Women in Tech: The Labor Market for Highly Skilled Software Engineers
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research
resolves10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German
resolves10.1093/ijpor/12.1.3
TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF THE SPIRAL OF SILENCE: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW AND EMPIRICAL OUTLOOK
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2022.4658
Dropping Anchor: A Field Experiment Assessing a Salary History Ban with Archival Replication
The 30 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDo workers comply with salary history bans? voluntary disclosure, adverse selection, and unraveling
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations
no DOI — not checkedIncomplete disclosure: Evidence of signaling and countersignaling
no DOI — not checkedPerpetuating wage inequality: evidence from salary history bans
no DOI — not checkedA theory of employee job search and quit rates
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedThe unintended consequences of ban the box
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedThe more you know: Information effects on job application rates in a large field experiment
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedCompetition and disclosure incentives: an empirical study of hmos
no DOI — not checkedIs no news (perceived as) bad news? an experimental investigation of information disclosure
no DOI — not checkedSalary history bans and wage bargaining: Experimental evidence
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedThe central role of the ask gap in gender pay inequality
no DOI — not checkedref78
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedIncomplete disclosure: Evidence of signaling and countersignaling
no DOI — not checkedref85
no DOI — not checkedThe more you know: Information effects on job application rates in a large field experiment
no DOI — not checkedCompetition and disclosure incentives: an empirical study of hmos
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4875545"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4875545/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4875545)