Reference health

Unveiling the Effects of Gender Discrimination and Gender Equality on Corporate Tax Aggressiveness

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4896983
CiteStamped reference-health badge
70/70 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 70 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.013
Audit committees, female directors and the types of female and male financial experts: Further evidence
resolves10.1111/1467-8551.12113
Endogeneity: How Failure to Correct for it can Cause Wrong Inferences and Some Remedies
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.02.003
Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance
resolves10.1111/1475-6803.00041
Do Female Mutual Fund Managers Manage Differently?
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.004
Board composition and CEO power
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.006
Executive board composition and bank risk taking
resolves10.1007/BF00381722
Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior
resolves10.2307/256795
BOARD COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP: EFFECTS OF SEX-BASED BIAS.
resolves10.2307/256829
ORGANIZATION-LEVEL DETERMINANTS OF WOMEN IN MANAGEMENT.
resolves10.1016/S1475-1488(04)07002-4
DETERMINANTS OF TAX PROFESSIONALS’ ADVICE AGGRESSIVENESS AND FEES
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00763.x
Risk Management in Corporate Governance: A Review and Proposal
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.06.008
Is there a gender gap in CEO compensation?
resolves10.1108/02686900410537775
Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent financial reporting
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.01.001
The impact of board gender composition on dividend payouts
resolves10.1111/acfi.12283
The effects of board gender diversity on a firm's risk strategies
resolves10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment
resolves10.1257/jel.47.2.448
Gender Differences in Preferences
resolves10.1080/23322039.2021.2023263
Audit committee characteristics and tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy
resolves10.1093/rof/rfn023
An Experimental Test of the Impact of Overconfidence and Gender on Trading Activity
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives
resolves10.1162/rest.91.3.537
Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value
resolves10.1108/MAJ-12-2018-2109
Audit committee characteristics and tax aggressiveness
resolves10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance
resolves10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1163
The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6288.2005.00102.x
Director Quality and Firm Performance
resolves10.1007/s11156-017-0635-z
Industry expertise on corporate boards
resolves10.1086/467037
Separation of Ownership and Control
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.12.001
Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender
resolves10.2308/atax-50819
Are Female CFOs Less Tax Aggressive? Evidence from Tax Aggressiveness
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.024
Is there a gender effect on the quality of audit services?
resolves10.1016/j.irfa.2021.102010
Board gender quotas, female directors and corporate tax aggressiveness: A causal approach
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.016
The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality
resolves10.3982/ECTA6690
Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence\\ From a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005
Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices?
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.004
Gender differences in overconfidence and risk taking: Do self-selection and socialization matter?
resolves10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.011
The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations
resolves10.5465/amj.2007.26279222
Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards
resolves10.1111/jbfa.12352
Tax avoidance, financial experts on the audit committee, and business strategy
resolves10.1016/j.intacc.2014.12.004
Institutional Investors, Risk/Performance and Corporate Governance
resolves10.2308/acch-50400
Female Auditors and Accruals Quality
resolves10.1111/1475-679X.12514
What Role Do Boards Play in Companies with Visionary CEOs?
resolves10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00073.x
Decision Making, Risk and Gender: Are Managers Different?
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.015
Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D)
resolves10.1016/j.bir.2019.07.005
The moderating effect of the board of directors on firm value and tax planning: Evidence from European listed firms
resolves10.1108/MAJ-02-2016-1319
Gender in accounting research: a review
resolves10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7
Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society
resolves10.1007/s10551-014-2052-8
Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance?
resolves10.1007/s10551-015-2815-x
Board of Director Gender and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: An Empirical Analysis
resolves10.1002/smj.575
She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00871.x
Did Board Configuration Matter? The Case of US Subprime Lenders
resolves10.1108/PAR-12-2016-0116
The efficiency of corporate boards and firms’ audit fees: the case of the FTSE financial institutions
resolves10.1111/jbfa.12409
Gender‐diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make?
resolves10.1108/02686901111171448
Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms
resolves10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00328.x
The Effects of Auditor Gender and Task Complexity on Information Processing Efficiency
resolves10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2896
Bridging the gap between corporate social responsibility performance and tax aggressiveness
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation
resolves10.1007/s10551-010-0485-2
Effects of Nationality, Gender, and Religiosity on Business-Related Ethicality
resolves10.1177/0007650310394642
Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility
resolves10.1108/ARJ-09-2014-0079
Women on the board of directors and corporate tax aggressiveness in Australia
resolves10.1108/IJSSP-10-2019-0211
Do women in board represent less corporate tax avoidance? A moderation analysis
resolves10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022127.51047.ef
The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?
resolves10.1007/s10551-004-4601-z
The Influence of Nationality and Gender on Ethical Sensitivity: An Application of the Issue-Contingent Model
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x
Female Directors and Earnings Quality*
resolves10.2308/ajpt-52560
Do Gender Diversity Recommendations in Corporate Governance Codes Matter? Evidence from Audit Committees
resolves10.1023/A:1025039105839
Sex Differences in Competitive and Compliant Unethical Work Behavior
resolves10.2469/faj.v63.n4.4749
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Expected Retirement Benefits
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedDo overlapped audit committee directors affect tax avoidance?
no DOI — not checkedEnhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedBoard Quotas and Director-Firm Matching
no DOI — not checkedref72
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4896983"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4896983/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4896983/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4896983)