Reference health

<p><span>Transforming Teachers’ Roles and Agencies in the Era of Generative AI: Perceptions, Acceptance, Knowledge, and Practices</span></p>

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4970687
CiteStamped reference-health badge
9/9 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

37 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 9 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
resolves10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and Generative AI
resolves10.61969/jai.1385915
Generative AI Professional Development Needs for Teacher Educators
resolves10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100183
Enhancing active learning through collaboration between human teachers and generative AI
resolves10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663
Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review
resolves10.3390/educsci13100998
ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education
resolves10.17705/1jais.00428
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead
resolves10.1002/tea.21885
<scp>AI</scp> and formative assessment: The train has left the station
resolves10.1080/03057267.2020.1735757
Applying machine learning in science assessment: a systematic review
The 37 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSupporting self-directed learning and self-assessment using TeacherGAIA, a generative AI chatbot application: Learning approaches and prompt engineering
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedMyths, mis-and preconceptions of artificial intelligence: A review of the literature
no DOI — not checkedTowards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers' professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education
no DOI — not checkedTeachers' motivation and engagement to harness generative AI for teaching and learning: The role of contextual, occupational, and background factors
no DOI — not checkedTechnology acceptance model
no DOI — not checkedPerspectives of Generative AI in Chemistry Education Within the TPACK Framework
no DOI — not checkedScience Teacher Perceptions of the State of Knowledge and Education at the Advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence Popularity
no DOI — not checkedAI to Support Guided Experiential Learning
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedThe promise and peril of generative AI
no DOI — not checkedGenerative AI and teachers' perspectives on its implementation in education
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedA Human-Centred Learning and Teaching Framework Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Self-Regulated Learning Development through Domain Knowledge Learning in K-12 Settings
no DOI — not checkedGenerative AI in K-12: Opportunities for Learning and Utility for Teachers
no DOI — not checkedTeachers' agency in the era of LLM and generative AI
no DOI — not checkedPhysicsAssistant: An LLM-Powered Interactive Learning Robot for Physics Lab Investigations
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedApplying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoring
no DOI — not checkedCollaborative Learning with Artificial Intelligence Speakers (CLAIS): Pre-Service Elementary Science Teachers' Responses to the Prototype
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedUsing ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service teachers' lesson planning
no DOI — not checkedTeachers' and Students' Perceptions of AI-Generated Concept Explanations: Implications for Integrating Generative AI
no DOI — not checkedBeyond Language Barriers: Allowing Multiple Languages in Postsecondary Chemistry Classes Through Multilingual Machine Learning
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedA Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Teaching Practice: Application Types, Pedagogical Roles, and Technological Characteristics
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedThe role of materiality in an era of generative artificial intelligence
no DOI — not checkedA Dialogic Approach to Transform Teaching
no DOI — not checkedUnleashing Pre-Service Language Teachers' Productivity with Generative AI: Emotions, Appraisal and Coping Strategies
no DOI — not checkedChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning
no DOI — not checkedPseudo AI Bias
no DOI — not checkedref46
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4970687"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4970687/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4970687/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.4970687)