Reference health

Demand Elasticity in Dynamic Asset Pricing

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5297190
CiteStamped reference-health badge
11/11 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29

Every reference with a DOI or an arXiv id in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

12 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and this line says so.

The 11 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1515/9781400829828
Mostly Harmless Econometrics
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhab104
Ratings-Driven Demand and Systematic Price Fluctuations
resolves10.1257/aer.104.2.379
A Macroeconomic Model with a Financial Sector
resolves10.1257/aer.103.2.732
Intermediary Asset Pricing
resolves10.1086/701683
A Demand System Approach to Asset Pricing
resolves10.1111/jofi.12757
Liquidity Risk and the Dynamics of Arbitrage Capital
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhs086
Asset Pricing and the Credit Market
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X
Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhac055
Benchmarking Intensity
resolves10.1017/S0022109009990317
Why Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04518.x
Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?
The 12 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAn arbitrage foundation for demand effects in asset pricing
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of impact investing
no DOI — not checkedHave Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedIn search of the origins of financial fluctuations: The inelastic markets hypothesis
no DOI — not checkedThe disappearing index effect
no DOI — not checkedAsset purchase rules: How QE transformed the bond market
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedWhich Investors Matter for Equity Valuations and Expected Returns?
no DOI — not checkedref23
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.5297190"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.5297190/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.5297190/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.5297190)