Reference health
A field test of two methods for density estimation
33%5B731%3Aaftotm%5D2.0.co%3B2/badge.svg){kind=icon}
20/20 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-21
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
1 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 20 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/1937188
Density Estimation of Small‐Mammal Populations Using a Trapping Web and Distance Sampling Methods
resolves10.1093/biomet/65.3.625
Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals
resolves10.2307/2531532
Estimating the Population Size for Capture-Recapture Data with Unequal Catchability
resolves10.2307/1383109
Estimation of Density of Mongooses with Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling
resolves10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00294.x
The Use of Mixed Logit Models to Reflect Heterogeneity in Capture‐Recapture Studies
resolves10.1111/1541-0420.00042
Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00222.x
Demographic consequences of sex‐biased dispersal in a population of brushtail possums
resolves10.32800/abc.2004.27.0217
DENSITY: software for analysing capture-recapture data from passive detector arrays
resolves10.2307/2533199
Estimating Population Size Via Sample Coverage for Closed Capture-Recapture Models
resolves10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00129.x
Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture‐Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities
resolves10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073[0001:SMDEAF]2.0.CO;2
SMALL-MAMMAL DENSITY ESTIMATION: A FIELD COMPARISON OF GRID-BASED VS. WEB-BASED DENSITY ESTIMATORS
resolves10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00434.x
Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures
resolves10.2307/2533843
Correction of Bias Due to Heterogeneous Capture Probability in Capture- Recapture Studies of Open Populations
resolves10.2307/1939171
Evaluation of a Density Estimator Based on a Trapping Web and Distance Sampling Theory
The 1 reference without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedI0091-7648-33-2-731-LUKACS1
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33%5B731%3Aaftotm%5D2.0.co%3B2"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33%5B731%3Aaftotm%5D2.0.co%3B2/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[33%5B731%3Aaftotm%5D2.0.co%3B2/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33%5B731%3Aaftotm%5D2.0.co%3B2)