Reference health

The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients’ Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China’s Good Doctor Website

https://doi.org/10.2196/10170
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 44 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-16

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.2307/1252270
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/1251919
The 42 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.014
Understanding consumer health information-seeking behavior from the perspective of the risk perception attitude framework and social support in mobile social media websites
resolves10.2196/jmir.2003
A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period
resolves10.2196/jmir.2157
Consistently Increasing Numbers of Online Ratings of Healthcare in England
resolves10.2196/jmir.2360
Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review
resolves10.2196/jmir.4365
The Development of Online Doctor Reviews in China: An Analysis of the Largest Online Doctor Review Website in China
resolves10.2196/jmir.4430
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews
resolves10.2196/jmir.8223
Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website
resolves10.3414/ME11-01-0045
Public Reporting in Germany: the Content of Physician Rating Websites
resolves10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.015
What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website
resolves10.1016/j.elerap.2016.01.002
How your colleagues’ reputation impact your patients’ odds of posting experiences: Evidence from an online health community
resolves10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0
Patients’ Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites
resolves10.2196/jmir.3991
Insights Into the Impact of Online Physician Reviews on Patients’ Decision Making: Randomized Experiment
resolves10.2196/jmir.3024
Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
resolves10.2196/jmir.6612
Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care
resolves10.2196/jmir.5889
Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study
resolves10.2196/jmir.5580
Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
resolves10.1002/hrm.20429
High‐commitment HR practices, employee effort, and firm performance: Investigating the effects of HR practices across employee groups within professional services firms
resolves10.2753/JEC1086-4415100304
The Role of Reputation Systems in Reducing On-Line Auction Fraud
resolves10.1145/1496930.1496935
The Impact of Seller Reputation on the Performance of online sales
resolves10.1080/08853134.2002.10754315
Self-Efficacy, Competitiveness, and Effort as Antecedents of Salesperson Performance
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.249
The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test.
resolves10.7819/rbgn.v16i52.1686
Os Fatores Preditores do Desempenho de Vendas: um estudo com vendedores atacadistas
resolves10.1080/00223980109603693
Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Effort in the Service Environment
resolves10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
Social Exchange Theory
resolves10.1080/07421222.2017.1334480
How Doctors Gain Social and Economic Returns in Online Health-Care Communities: A Professional Capital Perspective
resolves10.1287/isre.1110.0362
Reputation and Uncertainty in Online Markets: An Experimental Study
resolves10.2307/1911840
Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation Model
resolves10.1145/355112.355122
Reputation systems
resolves10.1080/10864415.2016.1171977
The Impact of Individual and Organizational Reputation on Physicians’ Appointments Online
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810
Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix
resolves10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001
Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective
resolves10.1111/j.0022-1821.2004.00237.x
ADVERSE SELECTION IN ELECTRONIC MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM ONLINE STAMP AUCTIONS
resolves10.1257/002205106776162717
On Doctors, Mechanics, and Computer Specialists: The Economics of Credence Goods
resolves10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.012
How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?
resolves10.1001/jama.2013.283194
Public Awareness, Perception, and Use of Online Physician Rating Sites
resolves10.1109/ICDCSW.2007.16
A Review on Trust and Reputation for Web Service Selection
resolves10.2753/jec1086-4415110405
The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511790928
Longitudinal and Panel Data
resolves10.1016/j.elerap.2015.04.001
Exploring the effects of patient-generated and system-generated information on patients’ online search, evaluation and decision
resolves10.1007/s10257-015-0272-9
Understanding online repurchase intention: social exchange theory and shopping habit
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.030
Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: A social exchange theory perspective
resolves10.1080/07359680903263565
The Path of Patient Loyalty and the Role of Doctor Reputation
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedLiuXGuoXWuHVogelDDoctor’s Effort Influence on Online Reputation and PopularitySmart Health2014International Conference on Smart Health (ICSH 2014)July 10-11, 2014Beijing, China11126
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checked[National Office of the Elderly Working Committee]20162019-01-23[Aging pressure on China's pension industry to be improved] http://www.cncaprc.gov.cn/contents/16/175826.html
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref54
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/10170"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/10170/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/10170/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/10170)