Reference health
Identifying and Overcoming Policy-Level Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Health Innovation: Qualitative Study
1 of 38 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-21
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
11 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and this line says so.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.12927/hcpap.2016.24719
The 37 checked references that resolve
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
resolves10.1186/1472-6947-8-47
Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: On an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines
resolves10.1186/1743-8462-5-17
Collaborative review of pilot projects to inform policy: A methodological remedy for pilotitis?
resolves10.1186/s12992-017-0275-z
Beyond pilotitis: taking digital health interventions to the national level in China and Uganda
resolves10.1080/03091902.2016.1213901
Why do entrepreneurial mHealth ventures in the developing world fail to scale?
resolves10.1258/jtt.2012.120219
Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management – an evidence synthesis
resolves10.12688/f1000research.8145.1
Promoting development and uptake of health innovations: The Nose to Tail Tool
resolves10.1186/1748-5908-1-18
Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success?
resolves10.1258/jtt.2010.100315
Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects
resolves10.1002/jhrm.20099
Healthcare innovation barriers: Results of a survey of certified professional healthcare risk managers
resolves10.2196/jmir.8775
Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3184876
Modernizing Canada's Healthcare System Through the Virtualization of Services
resolves10.1177/0951484813481589
Leadership and transformational change in healthcare organisations: A qualitative analysis of the North East Transformation System
resolves10.1370/afm.1713
From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider
resolves10.3998/mpub.17399
Mergers of Teaching Hospitals in Boston, New York, and Northern California
resolves10.3152/030234207x190487
Assessing recent developments in innovation measurement: the third edition of the <I>Oslo Manual</I>
resolves10.12927/hcq.2017.25016
Principles for Health System Capacity Planning: Insights for Healthcare Leaders
resolves10.2196/medinform.8207
Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators
resolves10.2196/jmir.8712
A Mobile App to Improve Self-Management of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Realist Evaluation
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.015
Emergent innovation systems and the delivery of clinical services: The case of intra-ocular lenses
resolves10.1038/s41746-018-0059-8
Beyond “implementation”: digital health innovation and service design
resolves10.1186/s12913-018-3615-7
Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare
resolves10.1136/leader-2017-000055
From pilot project to system solution: innovation, spread and scale for health system leaders
resolves10.1093/icc/12.3.437
Horndal at Heathrow? Capacity creation through co-operation and system evolution
The 11 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGovernmet of Canada20182019-11-11Notice: Health Canada's Approach to Digital Health Technologies https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medical-devices/activities/announcements/notice-digital-health-technologies.html
no DOI — not checkedHSJ | Health Service Journal20022019-11-11Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS: National Strategic Programme http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/publications/delivery_21_century_IT.pdf
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedBellRCanada Health Infoway20162019-11-11Ontario's Patients First: Digital Health Strategy https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/supporting-documents/partnership/3198-keynote-ontario-s-digital-health-strategy
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref45
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.
checked 2026-08-21 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/14994"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/14994/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/14994)