Reference health
Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment
1 of 49 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-30
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1136/qhc.13.5.388
The 48 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/isre.1100.0327
<b>Research Commentary</b>
—The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead
resolves10.1016/j.ergon.2011.02.006
Cognitive ergonomics, socio-technical systems, and the impact of healthcare information technologies
resolves10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000094
Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings
resolves10.1055/s-0039-1677907
Human Factors and Usability for Health Information Technology: Old and New Challenges
resolves10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_7
Morality in Design: Design Ethics and the Morality of Technological Artifacts
resolves10.1007/s10926-007-9108-x
The Impact of a Computerized Work Environment on Professional Occupational Groups and Behavioural and Physiological Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Symptoms: A Literature Review
resolves10.1007/s13246-014-0315-4
Mobile healthcare applications: system design review, critical issues and challenges
resolves10.2196/jmir.2600
Mobile Health Applications for the Most Prevalent Conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and Analysis
resolves10.1097/01.ncn.0000453182.72347.7c
Usability Testing and Comparison of Six Electronic Nursing Record Systems
resolves10.1186/2046-4053-4-11
User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review
resolves10.1016/j.ergon.2005.10.004
Usability in a medical technology context assessment of methods for usability evaluation of medical equipment
resolves10.1186/1472-6947-11-69
Quality of human-computer interaction - results of a national usability survey of hospital-IT in Germany
resolves10.1016/s0169-2607(97)00030-8
Cognitive evaluation: How to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010
National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: Physicians suffer from poor usability
resolves10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.005
Usability professionals—current practices and future development
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians’ experiences with EHRs in Finland
resolves10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4
Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals
resolves10.1097/CIN.0000000000000536
eHealth Services in the Near and Distant Future in Swedish Home Care Nursing
resolves10.1080/0144929x.2020.1864776
Walking in the jungle with a machete: ICT leaders’ perspectives on user-Centred systems design
resolves10.1093/jamia/ocab002
Moving toward a sociotechnical systems approach to continuous health information technology design: the path forward for improving electronic health record usability and reducing clinician burnout
resolves10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.003
The electronic health record’s impact on nurses’ cognitive work: An integrative review
resolves10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.021
Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: A framework to support ‘mesoergonomic’ inquiry
resolves10.5271/sjweh.668
Effect of mental and physical demands on muscular activity during the use of a computer mouse and a keyboard
resolves10.1037/h0055392
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
resolves10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001419
Healthcare information technology's relativity problems: a typology of how patients' physical reality, clinicians' mental models, and healthcare information technology differ
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-45916-5_1
Bridging the Gap Between Requirements Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction
resolves10.1109/re.2011.6051639
Requirements are slipping through the gaps &#x2014; A case study on causes &amp; effects of communication gaps in large-scale software development
resolves10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.020
Nursing and information and communication technology (ICT): A discussion of trends and future directions
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedLareauDThe Other Health Care Crisis: The Lack Of EHR Usability20202021-02-15Forbeshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/09/21/the-other-health-care-crisis-the-lack-of-ehr-usability/?sh=66beef0c293e
no DOI — not checkedMiliardMMayo Clinic study links EHR usability with clinician burnout20192021-02-15Healthcare IT Newshttps://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/mayo-clinic-study-links-ehr-usability-clinician-burnout
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedJohnsonMConrardyBKohamaZPiperARepetitive upper extremity musculoskeletal risks utilizing wearable sensor arm band versus keyboard and mouse for input2017Institute of Industrial & Systems Engineers (IISE) Annual Conference2017Pittsburgh, PA
no DOI — not checkedKushnirukASenathirajahYBoryckiEEffective usability engineering in healthcare: A vision of usable and safer healthcare IT2017MEDINFO 2017: Precision Healthcare through Informatics2017Hangzhou, ChinaInternational Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and IOS Press10661069
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedWhat is ergonomics?20202021-08-20International Ergonomics Association (IEA)https://iea.cc/what-is-ergonomics/
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-30 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/26694"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/26694/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/26694)