Reference health
Human-Centered Design to Address Biases in Artificial Intelligence
60/60 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 60 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103
HEALTH DISPARITIES AND HEALTH EQUITY: Concepts and Measurement
resolves10.1056/NEJMms2004740
Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms
resolves10.1016/j.oret.2018.10.014
Deep Learning–Based Algorithms in Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance
resolves10.2105/AJPH.2015.302755
Precision Medicine and Health Disparities: Advancing the Science of Individualizing Patient Care
resolves10.1007/s00439-019-01970-5
Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: applications, challenges and future perspectives
resolves10.1126/science.aax2342
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
resolves10.1016/j.outlook.2022.09.003
Algorithmic bias in health care: Opportunities for nurses to improve equality in the age of artificial intelligence
resolves10.2196/21798
AutoScore: A Machine Learning–Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records
resolves10.1109/tnnls.2020.3016670
Uncertainty-Gated Stochastic Sequential Model for EHR Mortality Prediction
resolves10.1162/dint_a_00097
Deep Learning with Heterogeneous Graph Embeddings for Mortality
Prediction from Electronic Health Records
resolves10.2196/31043
Artificial Intelligence Education Programs for Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review
resolves10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU
resolves10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
resolves10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.004
Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector
resolves10.1038/s41591-022-01993-y
The AI life cycle: a holistic approach to creating ethical AI for health decisions
resolves10.1001/jama.2019.16842
Lifecycle Regulation of Artificial Intelligence– and Machine Learning–Based Software Devices in Medicine
resolves10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103224
Auditing fairness under unawareness through counterfactual reasoning
resolves10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy
resolves10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e13567
Preventing clinical deterioration in cancer outpatients: Human centered design of a predictive model and response system.
resolves10.1080/21582041.2018.1563803
Regulating artificial intelligence and robotics: ethics by design in a digital society
resolves10.1097/ACM.0000000000004963
Competencies for the Use of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools by Health Care Professionals
resolves10.2196/37478
Considering Clinician Competencies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools in Health Care: Findings From a Scoping Review
resolves10.1007/s40670-021-01377-w
The Potential and the Imperative: the Gap in AI-Related Clinical Competencies and the Need to Close It
resolves10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab092
Risky business: a scoping review for communicating results of predictive models between providers and patients
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2022.107182
Whose AI? How different publics think about AI and its social impacts
resolves10.1001/jama.2018.20563
Promoting Trust Between Patients and Physicians in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.1038/s41591-020-01192-7
An algorithmic approach to reducing unexplained pain disparities in underserved populations
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.015
Validation sampling can reduce bias in health care database studies: an illustration using influenza vaccination effectiveness
resolves10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare
resolves10.1080/15265161.2022.2059199
Research on the Clinical Translation of Health Care Machine Learning: Ethicists Experiences on Lessons Learned
resolves10.31234/osf.io/y5nm9
Testing for Implicit Bias: Values, Psychometrics, and Science Communication
resolves10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3129
Lack of Transparency and Potential Bias in Artificial Intelligence Data Sets and Algorithms
resolves10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz054
Stigma, biomarkers, and algorithmic bias: recommendations for precision behavioral health with artificial intelligence
resolves10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_32
Artificial Intelligence for Humankind: A Panel on How to Create Truly Interactive and Human-Centered AI for the Benefit of Individuals and Society
resolves10.1136/medethics-2019-105860
Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic
resolves10.1117/1.JMI.7.1.016502
Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
resolves10.1007/978-981-19-1223-8_11
Interpretable AI in Healthcare: Enhancing Fairness, Safety, and Trust
resolves10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7
Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
resolves10.1080/23270012.2019.1671243
Perception of privacy and data protection in the context of the development of artificial intelligence
resolves10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_31
Explainable AI for Healthcare: From Black Box to Interpretable Models
resolves10.1097/ICU.0000000000000780
Applications of interpretability in deep learning models for ophthalmology
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedBendaNCRealeCAnckerJSRibeiroJWalshCGNovakLLPurpose, process, performance: designing for appropriate trust of AI in healthcare2021Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems2021Yokohama, Japan15
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedSalweiMENovakLLVogusTTangLAAndersSRealeCUnertlKSlagleJHarrisJWeingerMBFranceDDesigning resilient cancer care2022Podium Abstract in AMIANovember 2022Washington, DC
no DOI — not checkedBondRRMulvennaMDWanHFinlayDDWongAKoeneABriskRBogerJAdelTHuman centered artificial intelligence: weaving UX into algorithmic decision making2019RoCHI 2019: International Conference on Human-Computer InteractionOctober 17-18, 2019Bucharest, Romania29
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedvan StijnJJNeerincxMAten TeijeAVethmanSTeam design patterns for moral decisions in hybrid intelligent systems: a case study of bias mitigation20212021 AAAI Spring Symposium on Combining Machine Learning and Knowledge Engineering, AAAI-MAKE 2021March 22-24, 2021Palo Alto, USCEUR-WS112
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/43251"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/43251/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2196/43251)