Reference health
On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law
1/1 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-06
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
66 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 1 checked reference that resolves
resolves10.1163/18757413-90000004
The Second Lebanon War: Jus ad bellum, jus in bello and the Issue of Proportionality
The 66 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedtranslated in 8 Jap. Ann. Int’l L. 231, 240 (1964), available at <http://www.icrc.org/ihl-nat>.
no DOI — not checkedHolding the Center of the Law of Armed Conflict
no DOI — not checkedAn Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref020
no DOI — not checkedThe Least Restrictive Means
no DOI — not checkedContextualizing Proportionality. jus ad bellum and jus in bello in the Lebanese War
no DOI — not checkedProportionality and Force in International Law
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref09
no DOI — not checkedProportionality in the Morality of War
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref037
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref019
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref028
no DOI — not checkedThe Legality of the Fifty-two Year State of Emergency in Israel
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref046
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref062
no DOI — not checkedQandA: Mid-East War Crimes?
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref012
no DOI — not checkedThe Meaning of Necessary’in GATT Article XX and GATS Article XIV: The Myth of Cost-Benefit Balancing
no DOI — not checkedThe Caroline and McLeod Cases
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref053
no DOI — not checkedMethods and Means of ‘Combat, in
no DOI — not checkedThe Caroline: International Law Limits on Resort to Force, in
no DOI — not checkedProportionality and the Gulf of Maine Maritime Boundary Dispute,
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref03
no DOI — not checkedProportionality in WTO Law
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref07
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref017
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref013
no DOI — not checkedWeapons Causing Unnecessary Suffering: Are They Prohibited?
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref032
no DOI — not checkedLegal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion
no DOI — not checkedProportionality and Remedies in WTO Disputes
no DOI — not checkedIsrael’s Top Court Orders Separation Barrier Rerouted
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref063
no DOI — not checkedThe Doctrine of Proportionality in a Time of War
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref011
no DOI — not checkedThe Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law
no DOI — not checkedDeconstructing Proportionality in Limitations Analysis
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref039
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref036
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref057
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref061
no DOI — not checkedBook Faults Israeli Air War in Lebanon
no DOI — not checkedRetaliation or Arbitration—or Both? The 1978 United States- France Aviation Dispute
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref034
no DOI — not checkedScience Rewrites the Rules of Attraction
no DOI — not checkedThe Principle of Proportionality in Community Law: From the Rule of Law to Market Integration
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref08
no DOI — not checkedWorld Trade Organization Remedies and the Assessment of Proportionality: Equivalence and Appropriateness
no DOI — not checkedFault Lines in the Law of Attack, in
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref045
no DOI — not checkedOp-Ed, …No, It’s Survival
no DOI — not checkedImplementing Limitations on the Use of Force: The Doctrine of Proportionality and Necessity
no DOI — not checkedThe Rule of Proportionality and Protocol I in Conventional Warfare
no DOI — not checkedProportionality and Remedies in WTO Disputes
no DOI — not checkedHistorical Development and Legal Basis, in
no DOI — not checkedThe Principle of Proportionality in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights, in
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref027
no DOI — not checkedThe Biology of Beauty
no DOI — not checkedPolitical Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement, in
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref056
no DOI — not checkedProportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights, in
no DOI — not checkedCustoms of Warfare in Ancient India
no DOI — not checkedThe Secret Warin Central America and the Future of World Order
no DOI — not checkedProportionality and Balancing in WTO Law: A Comparative Perspective
no DOI — not checkedS0002930000195144_ref023
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-06 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2307/20456680"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2307/20456680/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2307/20456680)