Reference health
Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Crassulaceae inferred from <i>matK</i> sequence data
2 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
27 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and this line says so.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2441277
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2441442
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2399846
Phylogenetics of Seed Plants: An Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences from the Plastid Gene rbcL
resolves10.1007/s10592-005-9073-x
Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in endangered fern Adiantum reniforme var. sinense
resolves10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
resolves10.2307/2399875
Phylogenetic Inference in Saxifragaceae Sensu Stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) Using matK Sequences
resolves10.2307/1931934
Botanical Notes on the Canary Islands II. The Evolution of Plant Forms in the Islands: Aeonium
resolves10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10020193.x
Phylogenetic relationships in <i>Monanthes</i> (Crassulaceae) based on morphological, chloroplast and nuclear DNA variation
resolves10.2307/2399851
Phylogenetic Relationships Among Members of Saxifragaceae Sensu Lato Based on rbcL Sequence Data
resolves10.1080/10635150050207456
Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Internal Support on Phylogenetic Trees
resolves10.1007/BF00355398
The chloroplast tRNALys(UUU) gene from mustard (Sinapis alba) contains a class II intron potentially coding for a maturase-related polypeptide
resolves10.2307/2446032
Clarification of the relationship between Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data
resolves10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12717.x
<i>mat</i>K and <i>rbc</i>L gene sequence data indicate that <i>Saxifraga</i> (Saxifragaceae) is polyphyletic
resolves10.2307/2446027
Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences
resolves10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_1
Choosing an Approach and an Appropriate Gene for Phylogenetic Analysis
resolves10.1002/j.1537-2197.1948.tb08138.x
CYTOTAXONOMIC STUDIES IN THE SUBFAMILIES CRASSULOIDEAE, KALANCHOIDEAE, AND COTYLEDONOIDEAE OF THE CRASSULACEAE
resolves10.2307/2446561
Phylogenetic relationships in the Crassulaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction‐site variation
resolves10.1073/pnas.89.22.10648
Function and evolution of a minimal plastid genome from a nonphotosynthetic parasitic plant.
The 27 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCrassulaceae
no DOI — not checkedFlores Silvestres de las Islas Canarias
no DOI — not checkedSedum of North America North of the Mexican Plateau
no DOI — not checkedSympetaly—a systematic character?
no DOI — not checkedChromosome numbers of flowering plants
no DOI — not checkedHortus Botanicus Vindobonesis. 1
no DOI — not checkedSpecial Publication Number 3
no DOI — not checkedMacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution
no DOI — not checkedMes T. H. M.1995.Origin and evolution of the Macaronesian Sempervivoideae. Ph.D. dissertation Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
no DOI — not checkedThe status of Dudleya and
no DOI — not checkedChromosome numbers 1967–1974. Oosthoock's Uitgeversmaatschappij B
no DOI — not checked1921 Royal Horticultural Society London UK L. R. Praeger An account of the genus Sedum.
no DOI — not checkedQuimby M. W.1971.Floral morphology of Crassulaceae. Ph.D. dissertation University of Mississippi University Mississippi USA.
no DOI — not checkedVegetacion y Flora de La Palma
no DOI — not checkedCrassulaceae
no DOI — not checkedSedum, cultivated stonecrops
no DOI — not checkedPAUP* 4.0: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods) beta vers 4.0
no DOI — not checkedDiversity and classification of flowering plants
no DOI — not checkedThe white‐flowered Sedum species. 1. Principles of phylogenetic classification of the Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) and the position of the white flowered Sedum species
no DOI — not checkedEvolution and systematics of the Crassulaceae
no DOI — not checkedProposed new realignments in the angiosperms
no DOI — not checkedA revision of the genus Crassula in Southern Africa
no DOI — not checkedCrassulaceae
no DOI — not checkedChromosomes and phylogeny of the Crassulaceae
no DOI — not checkedThe hybrid origin of Echeveria × Sayulensis
no DOI — not checkedTacitus and polyploidy
no DOI — not checkedChromosomes and hybrids of Echeveria (Crassulaceae) I
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.
checked 2026-09-28 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2307/2657129"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2307/2657129/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2307/2657129)