Reference health

The ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial – a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults

https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19240
CiteStamped reference-health badge
3 of 87 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-01

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

22 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1302/0301-620X.79B3.7419
does not resolve to a known work10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.11316
does not resolve to a known work10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.13010
The 84 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4
An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures
resolves10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review
resolves10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00614-7
Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales
resolves10.1007/BF00932316
The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus
resolves10.1002/acr.21563
Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008
resolves10.1080/000164701753542023
The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures
resolves10.1097/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78
Update in the Epidemiology of Proximal Humeral Fractures
resolves10.1007/BF03324610
Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.003
Rehabilitation of two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus (two-year follow-up)
resolves10.1080/00016470310018252
Increased mortality after fracture of the surgical neck of the humerusA case-control study of 253 patients with a 12-year follow-up
resolves10.1007/s00198-003-1385-4
Cost-equivalence of different osteoporotic fractures
resolves10.1007/s00198-005-1993-2
Fragility fracture-related direct medical costs in the first year following a nonvertebral fracture in a managed care setting
resolves10.2106/JBJS.I.01505
Trends and Variation in Incidence, Surgical Treatment, and Repeat Surgery of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly
resolves10.1186/1471-2458-13-531
Trends in incidence and costs of injuries to the shoulder, arm and wrist in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2008
resolves10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.007
The epidemiology of open fractures in adults. A 15-year review
resolves10.2106/00004623-197052060-00001
Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures
resolves10.2106/00004623-199312000-00002
The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
resolves10.1007/s11999-012-2454-9
Classifications in Brief: The Neer Classification for Proximal Humerus Fractures
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.014
Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review
resolves10.1097/01.blo.0000194677.02506.45
Proximal Humerus Fracture Rehabilitation
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.70B5.3056948
Transcutaneous reduction and external fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical trial
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.66B1.6693466
Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus
resolves10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.056
Health and cost consequences of surgical versus conservative treatment for a comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.018
Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.016
Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L
Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head)
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.78B4.0780593
QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT SHOULDER SURGERY
resolves10.1186/1471-2474-13-261
Trends in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures – a nationwide 23-year study in Finland
resolves10.1097/01.blo.0000194674.56764.c0
New Trends in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
resolves10.1007/s00402-011-1430-2
All-arthroscopic intramedullary nailing of 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures: a new arthroscopic technique and preliminary results
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30217
Patient safety in orthopaedics
resolves10.1186/1471-2474-10-140
Protocol for the ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults
resolves10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7
The Oxford shoulder score revisited
resolves10.1308/003588407X155798
Learning Curves in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Case for Super-Specialisation?
resolves10.3310/hta5120
Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies
resolves10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023
A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder
resolves10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
resolves10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey
resolves10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.019
A comparison of the Constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures
resolves10.1136/bmj.330.7483.142
Clustering by health professional in individually randomised trials
resolves10.1136/bmj.c117
Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses
resolves10.1177/1740774507076914
Cost-effectiveness in clinical trials: using multiple imputation to deal with incomplete cost data
resolves10.2165/00148365-200504020-00001
Handling Missing Data in Patient-Level Cost-Effectiveness Analysis alongside Randomised Clinical Trials
resolves10.2307/2533947
Estimating Medical Costs from Incomplete Follow-Up Data
resolves10.1067/mse.2002.124346
Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: Purpose and reliable use
resolves10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.11.601
Developing the Allied Health Professions Research Network: Building Research Capacity and Capability
resolves10.1111/j.1758-5740.2009.00030.x
The UKUFF Trial and the NIHR Comprehensive Local Research Networks
resolves10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review
resolves10.1007/BF00361661
The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus
resolves10.2106/00004623-199312000-00003
The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus.
resolves10.2106/00004623-197052060-00002
Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures
resolves10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
resolves10.1057/9780230583993
Designing Randomised Trials in Health, Education and the Social Sciences
resolves10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
EuroQol: the current state of play
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2011.06.010
Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in patients with proximal humeral fractures
resolves10.3310/hta3100
Methods for the analysis of quality-of-life and survival data in health technology assessment.
resolves10.1002/hec.944
Estimating mean QALYs in trial‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility
resolves10.1136/bmj.d40
Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data
resolves10.1002/sim.4067
Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice
resolves10.1002/9780470316696
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
resolves10.1002/hec.843
Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non‐censored cost‐effectiveness data
resolves10.1177/0272989X07302132
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Data from Multinational Trials: The Use of Bivariate Hierarchical Modeling
resolves10.1016/0167-6296(93)90005-Y
On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis
resolves10.1177/0272989X9801800209
Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
resolves10.2165/00019053-200826090-00008
Exploring Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
resolves10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
resolves10.1136/bmj.319.7202.120
Economics notes: Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation
resolves10.3109/09638288.2013.829529
Reliability and validity of shoulder function outcome measures in people with a proximal humeral fracture
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.024
Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25702
Proximal humeral fractures
resolves10.1186/1471-2474-13-114
Surgeons agree more on treatment recommendations than on classification of proximal humeral fractures
resolves10.1007/s11999-012-2531-0
Hemiarthroplasty for Humeral Four-part Fractures for Patients 65 Years and Older: A Randomized Controlled Trial
resolves10.1186/1471-2474-13-167
Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004
Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: A systematic review
resolves10.1186/1745-6215-10-51
Effect of osteosynthesis, primary hemiarthroplasty, and non-surgical management for displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly: a multi-centre, randomised clinical trial
resolves10.1186/1471-2474-11-97
Primary hemiarthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly (ProCon): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled trial
resolves10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.005
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: patterns of use among newly trained orthopedic surgeons
resolves10.1186/1756-0500-6-69
Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?
resolves10.1097/00005131-200503000-00001
Impact of Smoking on Fracture Healing and Risk of Complications in Limb-Threatening Open Tibia Fractures
resolves10.1097/00003086-199908000-00024
Effect of Smoking on Tibial Shaft Fracture Healing
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.85B2.13717
Effect of smoking on early complications after elective orthopaedic surgery
resolves10.1002/sim.1377
Regression analysis of incomplete medical cost data
resolves10.1177/1536867X0500500404
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values: Update of Ice
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFirst Results on Population for England and Wales
no DOI — not checkedHealth and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics. URL: www.hscic.gov.uk/hes (accessed 29 May 2013).
no DOI — not checkedThe Shoulder: Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or about the Subacromial Bursa
no DOI — not checkedSkeletal Trauma: Basic Science, Management and Reconstruction. Volume 2
no DOI — not checkedFrontiers in Fracture Management
no DOI — not checkedInterventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults
no DOI — not checkedInterventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults
no DOI — not checkedElectromagnetic field stimulation for treating delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures in adults
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. 2nd edn. London: Department of Health; 2005. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-governance-framework-for-health-and-social-care-second-edition (accessed 16 December 2014).
no DOI — not checkedThe Care of Patients with Fragility Fracture (‘Blue Book’)
no DOI — not checkedGuide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal
no DOI — not checkedHealth and Social Care Information Centre. Would PACS Have Happened Anyway? URL: http://systems.hscic.gov.uk/pacs/learn/different/myth (accessed 31 October 2013).
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Health Informatics Directorate. NHS Connecting for Health (3ceased 1 March 2013). URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130502102046/http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/ (accessed 15 December 2014).
no DOI — not checkedUser’s Manual for the SF-12v2® Health Survey (With a Supplement Documenting SF-12® Health Survey)
no DOI — not checkedA Social Tariff for EuroQol: Results from a UK General Population Survey
no DOI — not checkedUnit Costs of Health and Social Care 2012
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Health. NHS Reference Costs 2011/12. 2012. URL: www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/11/2011–12-reference-costs/ (accessed 10 October 2013).
no DOI — not checkedBritish National Formulary
no DOI — not checkedStatistical Analysis with Missing Data
no DOI — not checkedClinicalTrials.gov. Operative Versus Non Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus (Shoulder Joint) Fractures. URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00818987 (accessed 2 December 2012).
no DOI — not checkedClinicalTrials.gov. Treatment of Comminuted Fractures of the Proximal Humerus. A Randomised, Controlled Study. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT00999193 (accessed 2 December 2012).
no DOI — not checkedJohansen A, Wakeman R, Boulton C, Plant F, Roberts J, Williams A. The National Hip Fracture Database. National Report 2013. URL: www.nhfd.co.uk/20/hipfractureR.nsf/luMenuDefinitions/CA920122A244F2ED802579C900553993/$file/NHFD%20Report%202013.pdf?OpenElement (accessed 13 March 2015).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-01 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3310/hta19240"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3310/hta19240/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3310/hta19240/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3310/hta19240)