Reference health
An Introduction to Forest Governance, People and REDD+ in Latin America: Obstacles and Opportunities
24/24 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-05
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
61 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 24 checked references that resolve
resolves10.5751/ES-02827-140126
Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.002
Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: Theory and narrative
resolves10.3390/f2010001
Landscape Transformation in Tropical Latin America: Assessing Trends and Policy Implications for REDD+
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An Overview
resolves10.1017/S1355770X06003494
Does natural resource extraction mitigate poverty and inequality? Evidence from rural Mexico and a Lacandona Rainforest Community
resolves10.3390/f1040230
Financing Sustainable Small-Scale Forestry: Lessons from Developing National Forest Financing Strategies in Latin America
resolves10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00415.x
Soybeans, Development and Conservation on the Amazon Frontier
resolves10.1016/0305-750X(85)90114-7
Environment, development and politics: Capital accumulation and the livestock sector in Eastern Amazonia
resolves10.1505/ifor.9.3.734
Trends in Latin American forestry decentralisations: legal frameworks, municipal governments and forest dependent groups
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.007
Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities
resolves10.1162/152638002320310536
Making the Law of the Jungle: The Reform of Forest Legislation in Bolivia, Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Indonesia.
resolves10.1007/s11625-007-0030-0
The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field
resolves10.1016/j.resourpol.2009.05.001
Corruption in natural resource management: Implications for policy makers
The 61 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCourt, J., Hyden, G., and Mease, K. Available online: www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/3132.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2010).
no DOI — not checkedECOSOC (UN Economic and Social Council) (2006). Note by the Secretariat, Committee of Experts on Public Administration, New York, NY, USA, 5th Session, New York, NY, USA, 27-31 March 2006, E/C.16/2006/4.
no DOI — not checkedAvailable online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTABOUTUS/Resources/gss-biodiversityreading3-forest-strategy-booklet.pdf (accessed on 28 July 2010).
no DOI — not checkedAvailable online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/ADecadeofmeasuringthequalityofgovernance.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2010).
no DOI — not checkedBell, S. (2002). Economic Governance and Institutional Dynamics, Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCotula, L., and Mayers, M. (2009). Tenure in REDD: Start-Point or Afterthought?, International Institute for Environment and Development.
no DOI — not checkedOyono, P.R., Ribot, J.C., and Larson, A.M. (2006). Green and Black Gold in Rural Cameroon: Natural Resources for Local Governance, Justice and Sustainability, Working Paper #22; World Resources Institute.
no DOI — not checkedSaunders, J., and Reeve, R. (2010, January 24–25). Monitoring Governance for Implementation of REDD+. London, UK.
no DOI — not checked(2006). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, FAO.
no DOI — not checkedParry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., and Hanson, C.E. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch13s13-3-2.html (accessed on 30 April 2010).
no DOI — not checked(2004). State of Forestry in the Latin American and Caribbean Region, FAO.
no DOI — not checkedCEPAL; FAO; IICA (2009). The Outlook for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Americas: A Perspective on Latin America and the Caribbean, IICA.
no DOI — not checkedQuijandría, B., Monares, A., and Ugarte, R. (2001). Assessment of Rural Poverty: Latin America and the Caribbean, IFAD.
no DOI — not checkedAyres, E. Mapping the nature of diversity: A landmark project reveals a remarkable correspondence between indigenous land use and the survival of natural areas. Available online: http://www.nativelands.org/PUBLICATIONS/Pub/MappingDIVERSITY.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2011).
no DOI — not checkedAvailable online: http://raisg.socioambiental.org/node/106 (accessed on 10 July 2010).
no DOI — not checkedFAOSTAT Available online: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed on 4 January 2011).
no DOI — not checkedInternational Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) (2006). Status of Tropical Forest Management 2005, ITTO.
no DOI — not checkedInter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1977). El subsector pecuario en Centroamerica, Division de Estudios Generales, Departamento de Desarrollo Económico y Social, IDB.
no DOI — not checkedClay, J.W. (1988). Indigenous People and Tropical Forests: Models of Land Use And Management from Latin America, Cultural Survival. Report 27.
no DOI — not checkedLarson, A.M., Barry, D., Dahal, G.R., and Colfer, C.J.P. (2010). Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform, Earthscan.
no DOI — not checkedTierra y libertad, the social function doctrine and land reform in Latin America
no DOI — not checkedWorld Bank (1997). World Development Report, Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCronkleton, P., Bray, D., and Medina, G. (September, January 31). Community forest management and REDD development: Lessons from Mexico, Bolivia and Brazil. Oaxaca.
no DOI — not checkedSchoneveld, G. (2011). Potential Land Use Competition from First-Generation Biofuel Expansion in Developing Countries (Occasional Paper), CIFOR.
no DOI — not checkedFischer, G., Hizsnyik, E., Prieler, S., Shah, M., and van Velthuizen, H. (2009). Biofuels and food security: Implications of an Accelerated Biofuels Production. Summary of the OFID Prepared by IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis), The OPEC Fund for International Development.
no DOI — not checkedBinswanger, H. (1989). Brazilian Policies That Encourage Deforestation, Working Paper No. 16; Environment Department, World Bank.
no DOI — not checkedSkutsch, M., Masera, O., and Gao, Y. (2010). Policies that Moderate the Impacts of Biofuels on Deforestation, Draft; CIFOR and UNAM.
no DOI — not checkedAngelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D., and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (2009). Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
no DOI — not checkedRibot, J.C., and Larson, A.M. (2005). Democratic Decentralization through a Natural Resource Lens, Routledge.
no DOI — not checkedCorbera, E., Estrada, M., May, P., Navarro, G., and Pacheco, P. (September, January 31). Rights to forests and carbon: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica. Oaxaca.
no DOI — not checkedBarragán, L. Available online: http://www.rlc.fao.org/es/tecnica/parques/pdf/DocBaseP.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2010).
no DOI — not checkedvan Dam, C. (September, January 31). Indigenous territories and REDD in Latin America: Opportunity or threat?. Oaxaca.
no DOI — not checked(2009). Tropical Forest Tenure Assessment: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities, International Tropical Timber Organization.
no DOI — not checkedLarson, A.M., Barry, D., Cronkleton, P., and Pacheco, P. (2008). Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America, CIFOR Occasional Paper 50; CIFOR.
no DOI — not checkedLarson, A.M., Barry, D., Dahal, G.R., and Colfer, C.J.P. (2010). Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform, Earthscan.
no DOI — not checkedLarson, A.M., and Mendoza-Lewis, J. (2009). Desafíos en la Tenencia Comunitaria de Bosques en la Región Autónoma Atlántico Norte (RAAN) de Nicaragua, CIFOR/URACCAN.
no DOI — not checkedMonterroso, I., and Barry, D. (2009). Tenencia de la tierra, bosques y medios de vida en la reserva de la biosfera Maya en Guatemala: Sistema de concesiones forestales comunitarias, CIFOR/FLACSO Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.
no DOI — not checkedCronkleton, P., Pacheco, P., Ibarguen, R., and Albornoz, M. (2009). Reformas en la tenencia de la tierra y los bosques: La gestión communal en las tierras bajas de Bolivia, CIFOR and CEDLA.
no DOI — not checkedPacheco, P., Nunes, W., Rocha, C., Vieira, I., Herrera, J., Alves, K., Feitosa, T., and Cayres, G. (2008). Acesso à terra e meios de vida: examinando suas interações em três locais no Estado do Pará, CIFOR,LAET/NEAF/UFPA/ARCA.
no DOI — not checkedCotula, L., Dyer, N., and Vermeulen, S. (2008). Fuelling Exclusion? The Biofuels Boom and Poor People's Access to Land, International Institute for Education and Development.
no DOI — not checkedAvailable online: http://www.fao.org/forestry/nfma/47655/en/ (accessed on 15 August 2010).
no DOI — not checkedMejoran las estadísticas forestales en Latinoamérica
no DOI — not checkedNavarro, G., Del Gatto, F., Faurby, O., and Arguello, A. (, January 29–31). Verificación de la Legalidad en el Sector Forestal Nicaraguense, San Salvador, El Salvador.
no DOI — not checkedCarvalheiro, K., Sabogal, C., and Amaral, P. (2008). Análise da legislação para o manejo florestal por pequenos produtores na Amazônia Brasileira, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
no DOI — not checkedContreras-Hermosilla, A. (September, January 31). People, governance and forests: The stumbling blocks in forest governance reform. Oaxaca.
no DOI — not checkedElías, E. (2007). Autogestión comunitaria de recursos naturales. El caso de Totonicapán, FLACSO.
no DOI — not checkedElías, S., Larson, A., and Mendoza, J. (2009). Tenencia de la tierra, Bosques y Medios de Vida en el Altiplano Occidental de Guatemala, CIFOR/FAUSAC.
no DOI — not checked(2006). Strengthening Forest Law Enforcement and Governance—Addressing a Systemic Constraint to Sustainable Development, World Bank.
no DOI — not checkedKaufmann, D. Available online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/misruleoflaw.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2010).
no DOI — not checkedWorld Resources Report (2005). The Wealth of the Poor: Managing Ecosystems to Fight Poverty, World Resources Institute.
no DOI — not checkedKaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance Matters VIII: Governance Indicators for 1996–2008, World Bank.
no DOI — not checkedBrown, D., Schreckenberg, K., Bird, N., Cerutti, P., Del Gatto, F., Diaw, C., Fomete, T., Luttrell, C., Navarro, G., and Oberndorf, R. (2008). Legal Timber: Verification and Governance in the Forest Sector, Overseas Development Institute.
no DOI — not checked(2005). Using Drivers of Change to Improve Aid Effectiveness, DFiD Practice paper; Department for International Development (DFID).
no DOI — not checkedCrooke, B., and Kothari, U. (2004). Participation: The New Tyranny, Zed Books Ltd.
no DOI — not checkedDurban Group for Climate Justice No REDD! No REDD Plus. Available online: http://www.durbanclimatejustice.org (accessed on 10 September 2010).
no DOI — not checkedSaule, N., Velasco, A.M., and Arashiro, Z. Available online: http://www.ids.ac.uk/logolink/resources/legalframeregional.htm (accessed on 15 August 2010).
no DOI — not checkedMendel, T. Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001832/183273e.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2010).
no DOI — not checkedAccess Initiative. Available online: http://www.accessinitiative.org (accessed on 10 June 2010).
no DOI — not checkedAvritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America, Princeton University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCuellar, N., Kandel, S., Davis, A., and Elizondo, D. (2010). El proceso de preparacion para REDD+ en Mesoamerica, PRISMA: San Salvador and Grupo Cabal.
no DOI — not checkedAngelsen, A. (2009). Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, CIFOR.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-05 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/f2010086"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/f2010086/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/f2010086)