Reference health
Beyond the Metal Flesh: Understanding the Intersection between Bio- and AI Ethics for Robotics in Healthcare
101/101 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
45 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 101 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1089/cyber.2020.0181
Relationship Development with Humanoid Social Robots: Applying Interpersonal Theories to Human–Robot Interaction
resolves10.1080/10447318.2020.1801172
A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Research on Human Interaction with Social Robots
resolves10.2196/jmir.8640
Using Robots at Home to Support Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101726
The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: A critical literature review
resolves10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000371
Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review
resolves10.2196/13216
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy
resolves10.1186/s12910-022-00746-3
Embedded ethics: a proposal for integrating ethics into the development of medical AI
resolves10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322
Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility?
resolves10.1007/s10551-008-9890-1
An Ethical Framework for the Marketing of Corporate Social Responsibility
resolves10.1080/713856145
Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results
resolves10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-99740-7_1
Current Advances, Trends and Challenges of Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction: From Machine Learning to Explainable AI
resolves10.1007/978-3-030-29371-0_21
Ethical Considerations About the Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Finance
resolves10.1007/s13347-022-00543-1
Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI’s “Eradication of Difference”
resolves10.1109/JPROC.2019.2897447
The Trolley, The Bull Bar, and Why Engineers Should Care About The Ethics of Autonomous Cars [point of view]
resolves10.1145/3593013.3594024
Invigorating Ubuntu Ethics in AI for healthcare: Enabling equitable care
resolves10.1080/03605310590907084
The Hippocratic Oath and Contemporary Medicine: Dialectic Between Past Ideals and Present Reality?
resolves10.1177/2168479013484159
Defining Patient-Centricity: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications for Clinical Care and Research
resolves10.1017/S0963180101001098
What Is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations
of the Four Principles Approach
resolves10.1016/S1556-3499(13)60161-8
The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate
resolves10.3389/fped.2019.00312
Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support
resolves10.1111/bioe.12887
Responsibility beyond design: Physicians’ requirements for ethical medical AI
resolves10.1186/s12913-018-3359-4
Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare?
resolves10.1109/CSPA.2012.6194716
Initial response of autistic children in human-robot interaction therapy with humanoid robot NAO
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120686
Tensions and antagonistic interactions of risks and ethics of using robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care
resolves10.1007/s12369-019-00605-z
Gathering Expert Opinions for Social Robots’ Ethical, Legal, and Societal Concerns: Findings from Four International Workshops
resolves10.1093/oxrep/gry007
Political machinery: did robots swing the 2016 US presidential election?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2588669
'Who's Johnny?' Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy
resolves10.3389/frobt.2020.00001
Designing Ethical Social Robots—A Longitudinal Field Study With Older Adults
resolves10.1007/s11948-015-9649-x
A Survey of Expectations About the Role of Robots in Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.064
What robots can teach us about intimacy: The reassuring effects of robot responsiveness to human disclosure
resolves10.5465/annals.2018.0057
Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
resolves10.1007/s10202-011-0098-6
Service robotics: do you know your new companion? Framing an interdisciplinary technology assessment
resolves10.1136/bmj.n304
Does “AI” stand for augmenting inequality in the era of covid-19 healthcare?
resolves10.1007/s11673-022-10200-z
Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: A scoping review
resolves10.1002/hast.973
Artificial Intelligence and Black‐Box Medical Decisions: <i>Accuracy versus Explainability</i>
resolves10.1017/err.2020.10
Legal and Technical Feasibility of the GDPR’s Quest for Explanation of Algorithmic Decisions: of Black Boxes, White Boxes and Fata Morganas
resolves10.1145/3491102.3502066
Public Views on Digital COVID-19 Certificates: a Mixed Methods User Study
resolves10.1007/s12369-019-00612-0
Can We Agree on What Robots Should be Allowed to Do? An Exercise in Rule Selection for Ethical Care Robots
resolves10.1017/S0963180100902044
Business Ethics, Stakeholder Theory, and the Ethics of Healthcare
Organizations
resolves10.1097/HCM.0b013e3181fa050e
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Future Health Care Manager
resolves10.1016/j.pedn.2019.04.027
Nurses' Views on the Potential Use of Robots in the Pediatric Unit
resolves10.1177/0969733019848031
Advance care planning with chronically ill patients: A relational autonomy approach
resolves10.1177/0018720820922080
Evolving Trust in Robots: Specification Through Sequential and Comparative Meta-Analyses
resolves10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958
Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves
resolves10.1111/jnu.12435
Care Personnel's Attitudes and Fears Toward Care Robots in Elderly Care: A Comparison of Data from the Care Personnel in Finland and Japan
resolves10.1007/s10015-019-00525-1
Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values: the cases of military drones and companion robots
resolves10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y
Care, Monitoring, and Companionship: Views on Care Robots from Older People and Their Carers
resolves10.1177/2050157919843961
The privacy implications of social robots: Scoping review and expert interviews
resolves10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
“Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
resolves10.1007/s10676-016-9413-1
Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study
resolves10.1137/1.9781611973440.71
The Benefits of Personalized Smartphone-Based Activity Recognition Models
resolves10.3390/technologies6020049
Task Engagement as Personalization Feedback for Socially-Assistive Robots and Cognitive Training
resolves10.15607/RSS.2022.XVIII.063
Bridge Data: Boosting Generalization of Robotic Skills with Cross-Domain Datasets
resolves10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655
The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: A comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies
resolves10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018
Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation
resolves10.1186/s12877-020-01641-5
Ethical perceptions towards real-world use of companion robots with older people and people with dementia: survey opinions among younger adults
resolves10.1186/1472-6939-16-4
Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02030.x
The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients
resolves10.1002/hfm.20316
Developing Elements of User Experience for Mobile Phones and Services: Survey, Interview, and Observation Approaches
resolves10.1111/1467-9515.00086
Which Champions, Which People? Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation
resolves10.1136/medethics-2018-105190
Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees
resolves10.1186/s12910-015-0004-1
Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm
The 45 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedNiemelä, M., Heikkinen, S., Koistinen, P., Laakso, K., Melkas, H., and Kyrki, V. (2021). Robots and the Future of Welfare Services—A Finnish Roadmap, Aalto University.
no DOI — not checkedVallor, S. (2020). Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, Routledge.
no DOI — not checkedWagner, E., and Borycki, E.M. (2022). Informatics and Technology in Clinical Care and Public Health, IOS Press.
no DOI — not checkedLong-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes
no DOI — not checkedCaring in the in-between: A proposal to introduce responsible AI and robotics to healthcare
no DOI — not checked(2023, June 30). Normative Approach. Available online: https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100238783;jsessionid=F2BC2B6AF0277F7B5FCC93F914EC5FC8.
no DOI — not checked(2020). IEEE Recommended Practice for Assessing the Impact of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems on Human Well-Being. Standard No. IEEE Std 7010-2020.
no DOI — not checkedEU (2021). Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts, European Parliament, Council of the European Union.
no DOI — not checkedLegal Implications of Using AI as an Exam Invigilator
no DOI — not checkedHagerty, A., and Rubinov, I. (2019). Global AI ethics: A review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. arXiv.
no DOI — not checkedMedical ethics: The moral responsibilities of physicians
no DOI — not checkedWHO (2022). Ageing and Health, WHO.
no DOI — not checkedCalo, C.J., Hunt-Bull, N., Lewis, L., and Metzler, T. (2011, January 7–11). Ethical implications of using the paro robot, with a focus on dementia patient care. Proceedings of the Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.
no DOI — not checkedAge UK (2015). Only the Tip of the Iceberg: Fraud against Older People, Age UK.
no DOI — not checkedCommission, E. (2016). Regulation
no DOI — not checked(EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679.
no DOI — not checkedDenning, T., Matuszek, C., Koscher, K., Smith, J.R., and Kohno, T. (October, January 30). A spotlight on security and privacy risks with future household robots: Attacks and lessons. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Orlando, FL, USA.
no DOI — not checkedMüller, V.C. (2020). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University.
no DOI — not checkedThe rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of mass unemployment
no DOI — not checkedA robotic new hope: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations of social robots
no DOI — not checkedTurkle, S. (2010). Close Engagements with Artificial Companions, John Benjamins.
no DOI — not checkedThe Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds Between Humans and Social Robots
no DOI — not checkedDarling, K. (2016). Robot Law, Edward Elgar Publishing.
no DOI — not checkedSchiappa, E., Allen, M., and Gregg, P.B. (2007). Mass Media Effects Research: Advances through Meta-Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
no DOI — not checked(2023, June 02). Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department, Citizens’s Riths and Costitutional Affairs European Civil Law Rules on Robotics. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU(2016)571379_EN.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedRobert Koch Institute (2023, June 02). Gesundheit in Deutschland. Available online: https://www.gbe-bund.de/pdf/gesber2015.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedMordor Intellegence (2023, June 02). Social Robots Market Size, Share, Growth, Trends: 2022–2027. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/social-robots-market.
no DOI — not checked(2023, June 30). The ‘AI Divide’ between the Global North and the Global South. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/davos23-ai-divide-global-north-global-south/.
no DOI — not checkedBuolamwini, J., and Gebru, T. (2018, January 23–24). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, New York, NY, USA.
no DOI — not checkedWest, S.M., Whittaker, M., and Crawford, K. (2019). Discriminating systems. AI Now, Available online: https://ainowinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/discriminatingsystems.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Parliamentary Research Service (2019). Understanding Algorithmic Decision-Making: Opportunities and Challenges, European Parliamentary Research Service.
no DOI — not checkedGeorge, J.F., Paul, S., De’, R., Karahanna, E., Sarker, S., and Oestreicher-Singer, G. (2020, January 13–16). White, Grey, Black: Effects of XAI Augmentation on the Confidence in AI-based Decision Support Systems. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2020, Making Digital Inclusive: Blending the Locak and the Global, Hyderabad, India.
no DOI — not checkedBoch, A., Hohma, E., and Trauth, R. (2022). Towards an Accountability Framework for AI: Ethical and Legal Considerations, Institute for Ethics in AI, Technical University of Munich.
no DOI — not checkedNyholm, S., and Frank, L.E. (2017). Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications, MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedLa responsabilità sociale in medicina
no DOI — not checkedThe purpose of bedside robots: Exploring the needs of inpatients and healthcare professionals
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Worthington, H., Simmonds, P., Farla, K., and Varnai, P. (2018). The Silver Economy: Final Report, Publications Office, Technopolis Group.
no DOI — not checkedWorld Health Organisation (WHO) (2023, June 02). Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WHO-Active-Ageing-Framework.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedvan Wynsberghe, A.L. (2012). Designing Robots with Care: Creating an Ethical Framework for the Future Design and Implementation of Care Robots. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente].
no DOI — not checkedHerstatt, C., Kohlbacher, F., and Bauer, P. (2011). “Silver” Product Design: Product Innovation for Older People, Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH). Technical Report, Working Paper.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Patient Forum (2016). Clinical Trials Regulation: Informed Consent and Information to Patients, European Patient Forum. Available online: https://www.eupatient.eu/globalassets/policy/clinicaltrials/epf_informed_consent_position_statement_may16.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedAbney, K., Bekey, G.A., and Lin, P. (2014). Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, The MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedUnited Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations.
no DOI — not checkedReleases, P. (2023, June 30). AI Act: A Step Closer to the First Rules on Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230505IPR84904/ai-act-a-step-closer-to-the-first-rules-on-artificial-intelligence.
no DOI — not checkedISO (2023, June 30). ISO IEC JTC 1 SC 42 Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/robotics12040110"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/robotics12040110/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/robotics12040110)