Reference health
Human–Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Applications: A Review
54/54 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 54 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1109/ICRA.2015.7140065
A framework for end-user instruction of a robot assistant for manufacturing
resolves10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.113
Skill-based Dynamic Task Allocation in Human-Robot-Cooperation with the Example of Welding Application
resolves10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.080
Process-oriented Task Assignment for Assembly Processes with Human-robot Interaction
resolves10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.101
Human–robot collaborative assembly in cyber-physical production: Classification framework and implementation
resolves10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.014
Design Considerations for Safe Human-robot Collaborative Workplaces
resolves10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.186
Axiomatic Design Approach for Human-robot Collaboration in Flexibly Linked Assembly Layouts
resolves10.1007/s00170-018-03247-z
Collaborative and traditional robotic assembly: a comparison model
resolves10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.001
New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design
resolves10.1108/01445151311294603
Fully flexible assembly systems (F-FAS): a new concept in flexible automation
resolves10.1109/CoASE.2013.6653962
Structured collaborative behavior of industrial robots in mixed human-robot environments
resolves10.1109/ISR.2013.6695707
Collaborative behavior design of industrial robots for multiple human-robot collaboration
resolves10.1109/IROS.2013.6696492
Path-consistent safety in mixed human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments
resolves10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2708658
Physical Human–Robot Interaction (pHRI) in 6 DOF With Asymmetric Cooperation
resolves10.1109/INDIN.2018.8472058
Flexible programming and orchestration of collaborative robotic manufacturing systems
resolves10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907165
Anticipating human actions for collaboration in the presence of task and sensor uncertainty
resolves10.1109/SII.2017.8279364
Collaborative and robot-based plug & produce for rapid reconfiguration of modular production systems
resolves10.3390/mi9110576
Development of Flexible Robot Skin for Safe and Natural Human–Robot Collaboration
resolves10.3390/app8030344
Safety Design and Development of a Human-Robot Collaboration Assembly Process in the Automotive Industry
resolves10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.08.006
Seamless human robot collaborative assembly – An automotive case study
resolves10.1109/ISAM.2009.5376915
A new cell production assembly system with twin manipulators on mobile base
resolves10.1109/IROS.2009.5354155
Human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: Design and development
resolves10.1109/IROS.2011.6048257
A human-centered approach to robot gesture based communication within collaborative working processes
resolves10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525644
Interleaved Online Task Planning, Simulation, Task Allocation and Motion Control for Flexible Human-Robot Cooperation
resolves10.1109/TII.2018.2882741
Prediction of Human Activity Patterns for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly Tasks
resolves10.1109/THMS.2018.2883176
Controlling Object Hand-Over in Human–Robot Collaboration Via Natural Wearable Sensing
resolves10.1109/TASE.2017.2748386
Collaborative Assembly in Hybrid Manufacturing Cells: An Integrated Framework for Human–Robot Interaction
resolves10.1109/TRO.2016.2540623
Learning Physical Collaborative Robot Behaviors From Human Demonstrations
resolves10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.126
Human-robot Collaboration Demonstrator Combining Speech Recognition and Haptic Control
resolves10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.677
Human robot cooperation planner using plans embedded in objects**This work was undertaken during the EPSRC (via the Centre in Innovative Manufacturing in Intelligent Automation) funded feasibility study named ‘HRI Team Work Study’ (HRITWS) at Bristol Robotics Laboratory
resolves10.1109/LRA.2018.2812906
Human-Aware Robotic Assistant for Collaborative Assembly: Integrating Human Motion Prediction With Planning in Time
resolves10.1109/ROBIO.2015.7418934
A programming by demonstration system for human-robot collaborative assembly tasks
resolves10.12913/22998624/86476
The Design of Method Intended for Implementation of Collaborative Assembly Tasks
resolves10.1109/IROS.2017.8205971
Design of a collaborative architecture for human-robot assembly tasks
resolves10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.124
Safety-Focussed Design of Collaborative Assembly Station with Large Industrial Robots
resolves10.1109/TASE.2015.2412256
Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: Metrics and control
resolves10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.038
Augmented reality system for operator support in human–robot collaborative assembly
resolves10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989344
Iteratively Learned and Temporally Scaled Force Control with application to robotic assembly in unstructured environments
resolves10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.221
Teaching Assembly by Demonstration Using Advanced Human Robot Interaction and a Knowledge Integration Framework
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDLR—Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics (2019, November 30). History of the DLR LWR. Available online: https://www.dlr.de/rm/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-12464/21732_read-44586/.
no DOI — not checkedUniversal Robots (2019, November 30). Low Cost and Easy Programming Made the UR5 a Winner. Available online: https://www.universal-robots.com/case-stories/linatex/.
no DOI — not checkedGravel, D.P., and Newman, W.S. (2001, January 5–7). Flexible robotic assembly efforts at Ford Motor Company. In Proceeding of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC’01) (Cat. No. 01CH37206), Mexico City, Mexico.
no DOI — not checkedFANUC Italia, S.r.l (2019, November 30). M-2000—The Strongest Heavy Duty Industrial Robot in the Marker. Available online: https://www.fanuc.eu/it/en/robots/robot-filter-page/m-2000-series.
no DOI — not checkedHägele, M., Schaaf, W., and Helms, E. (2002, January 7–11). Robot assistants at manual workplaces: Effective co-operation and safety aspects. Proceedings of the 33rd ISR (International Symposium on Robotics), Stockholm, Sweden.
no DOI — not checkedRahman, S.M., Wang, Y., Walker, I.D., Mears, L., Pak, R., and Remy, S. (2016, January 21–25). Trust-based compliant robot-human handovers of payloads in collaborative assembly in flexible manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Fort Worth, TX, USA.
no DOI — not checkedTan, J.T.C., Zhang, Y., Duan, F., Watanabe, K., Kato, R., and Arai, T. (October, January 27). Human factors studies in information support development for human-robot collaborative cellular manufacturing system. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2009—The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan.
no DOI — not checkedRahman, S.M., Liao, Z., Jiang, L., and Wang, Y. (2016, January 21–25). A regret-based autonomy allocation scheme for human-robot shared vision systems in collaborative assembly in manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Fort Worth, TX, USA.
no DOI — not checkedMarketsandMarkets™ Research Private Ltd. (2019, November 30). Collaborative Robots Market by Payload Capacity (Up to 5 kg, Up to 10 kg, Above 10 kg), Industry (Automotive, Electronics, Metals & Machining, Plastics & Polymer, Food & Agriculture, Healthcare), Application, and Geography—Global Forecast to 2023. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/collaborative-robot-market-194541294.html.
no DOI — not checkedInternational Federation of Robotics (IFR) (2019, November 30). Robots and the Workplace of the Future. Available online: https://ifr.org/papers.
no DOI — not checkedBarclays Investment Bank (2019, November 30). Technology’s Mixed Blessing. Available online: https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/our-insights/technologys-mixed-blessing.html.
no DOI — not checkedTobe, F. (2019, November 30). Why Co-Bots Will Be a Huge Innovation and Growth Driver for Robotics Industry. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/industrial-robots/collaborative-robots-innovation-growth-driver.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/robotics8040100"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/robotics8040100/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/robotics8040100)