Reference health
Investigating the Factors That Determine the ESG Disclosure Practices in Europe
69/69 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 69 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173
An Empirical Investigation of U.K. Environmental Targets Disclosure: The Role of Environmental Governance and Performance
resolves10.3390/su142215358
Exploring the Status Quo of Adopting the 17 UN SDGs in a Developing Country—Evidence from Vietnam
resolves10.1002/csr.1695
Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?
resolves10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501
The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score
resolves10.1002/csr.2134
Extending the benefits of <scp>ESG</scp> disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing
resolves10.1057/jibs.2012.26
What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions
resolves10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure
resolves10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance
resolves10.1002/bse.1960
Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence
resolves10.1002/csr.1452
Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies
resolves10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0032
Board directors' home regions and CSR disclosure: evidence from France
resolves10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018
Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores
resolves10.1002/bse.2262
Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference?
resolves10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1
Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure
resolves10.3390/joitmc7020127
ESG Importance for Long-Term Shareholder Value Creation: Literature vs. Practice
resolves10.1007/s10551-012-1336-0
Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy
resolves10.1108/03090560110694763
Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing ‐ Seeing through the fog
resolves10.1002/bse.1927
Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study
resolves10.3390/su12093910
Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure
resolves10.3390/su12135317
Does Good ESG Lead to Better Financial Performances by Firms? Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Models of Public Enterprises in Europe
resolves10.1108/14637150610710945
Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective
resolves10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting : Hits, misses and ways forward
resolves10.1007/s10551-010-0469-2
Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the Views of Management Teams in Large Companies
resolves10.3905/jwm.2021.1.130
Sustainable Investing: The Black Box of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Ratings
resolves10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6340
The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Firm Financial Performance
resolves10.1002/bse.2589
Does the EU Directive on non‐financial information influence the value relevance of ESG disclosure? Italian evidence
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120509
Human resources disclosure in the EU Directive 2014/95/EU perspective: A systematic literature review
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001
Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link
resolves10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7
The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature
resolves10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.003
Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective
resolves10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature
resolves10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility
resolves10.1080/20430795.2022.2128710
Corporate ESG engagement and information asymmetry: the moderating role of country-level institutional differences
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00444.x
Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non‐Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men.
resolves10.3390/su10082752
Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms
resolves10.1509/jm.12.0089
Corporate Social Responsibility in Business-to-Business Markets: How Organizational Customers Account for Supplier Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement
resolves10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making
resolves10.1108/02686901311282506
Characteristics of audit committee financial experts: an empirical study
resolves10.1177/0170840603024001341
Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
resolves10.1111/joms.12209
Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050
Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach
resolves10.3390/su11185077
CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain
resolves10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility
resolves10.1002/bse.3059
Democracy, national culture and greenhouse gas emissions: An international study
resolves10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102071
Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance
resolves10.1002/bse.2635
Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint
resolves10.1177/0092070395231006
The Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility on Organizational Effectiveness: A Survey of Marketers
resolves10.1108/MEDAR-06-2019-0507
The impact of the EU Directive on non-financial information: Novel features of the Italian case
resolves10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029
Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany
resolves10.1111/jbfa.12066
Measuring Country Differences in Enforcement of Accounting Standards: An Audit and Enforcement Proxy
resolves10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe Impact of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Disclosures on Firm Value: Evidence from Egypt
no DOI — not checkedThe Financial and Market Consequences of Environmental, Social and Governance Ratings: The Implications of Recent Political Volatility in Egypt
no DOI — not checkedSwiss Federal Department United Nations of Foreign Affairs and United Nations (2023, January 01). Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. Available online: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf.
no DOI — not checkedInstitutional Framework of ESG Disclosures: Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries
no DOI — not checkedDo Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives Make for Better CSR
no DOI — not checkedImpact of ESG Disclosure and Financial Reporting Quality on Investment Efficiency
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental, Social and Governance Disclosures in Europe
no DOI — not checkedSustainability Accounting and Reporting: Development, Linkages and Reflection. An Introduction
no DOI — not checkedDoes ESG Disclosure Influence Firm Performance?
no DOI — not checkedScott, W.R., and Meyer, W.J. (1994). Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, Sage.
no DOI — not checkedBoard Gender Diversity and ESG Disclosure: Evidence from the USA
no DOI — not checkedSignaling Theory: A Review and Assessment
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices and Performance in Shariah Firms: Agency or Stakeholder Theory?
no DOI — not checkedThornton, P.H., and Flynn, K.H. (2003). Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, Springer.
no DOI — not checkedScott, W.R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, SAGE Publications. Available online: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NbQgAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=+Institutions+and+organizations+scott+2001&ots=hGVafGoj_E&sig=ItBTKCHceiIRffis2nTtX4Qme9M&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Institutions%20and%20organizations%20scott%202001&f=false.
no DOI — not checkedAn Overview of Legitimacy Theory on the Influence of Company Size and Industry Sensitivity towards CSR Disclosure
no DOI — not checkedA Cross Cultural Perspective on Perceived Leadership Effectiveness
no DOI — not checkedA Transaction Cost Theory of Politics
no DOI — not checkedA Global Analysis of Corporate Social Performance: The Effects of Cultural and Geographic Environments
no DOI — not checkedDoes National Culture Influence Corporate ESG Disclosures? Evidence from Cross-Country Study
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/su15065508"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/su15065508/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3390/su15065508)