A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
The elusive tradeoff: Speed vs accuracy in visual discrimination tasks
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBloch, A. M. (1885). Expériences sur la vision.Comptes Rendus de la Societé de Biologie,37, 493–495.
no DOI — not checkedLaming, D. R. J. (1968).Information theory of choice reaction time. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedLink, S. W. (1992).The wave theory of difference and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedLuce, R. D. (1986).Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedRatcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2002).Diffusion model account of lexical decision. Manuscript submitted for publication.
no DOI — not checkedRatcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (in press). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
no DOI — not checkedSlamecka, N. J. (1991). The analysis of recognition. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 297–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedWatson, A. B. (1986). Temporal sensitivity. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 6-1 to 6-43. New York: Wiley.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-18 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.