Reference health

Primary platinum resistance and its prognostic impact in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: an analysis of three prospective trials from the NOGGO study group

https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37
CiteStamped reference-health badge
18/18 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 18 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/annonc/mdw663
Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup: recurrent disease
resolves10.1200/JCO.2001.19.14.3312
Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Versus Topotecan
resolves10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6735
Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
resolves10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2183
Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
resolves10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.022
A randomised comparison of treosulfan and carboplatin in patients with ovarian cancer: A study by the Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG)
resolves10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4489
Bevacizumab Combined With Chemotherapy for Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The AURELIA Open-Label Randomized Phase III Trial
resolves10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30372-3
Sorafenib plus topotecan versus placebo plus topotecan for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TRIAS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
resolves10.1093/annonc/mdw236
Prognostic and predictive effects of primary versus secondary platinum resistance for bevacizumab treatment for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the AURELIA trial
resolves10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8911
Topotecan Weekly Versus Conventional 5-Day Schedule in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group
resolves10.1007/s00432-016-2307-0
A phase III, open label, randomized multicenter controlled trial of oral versus intravenous treosulfan in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer: a study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO)
resolves10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1396
High-Throughput Genomics and Clinical Outcome in Hard-to-Treat Advanced Cancers: Results of the MOSCATO 01 Trial
resolves10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1408
Bevacizumab Combined With Weekly Paclitaxel, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, or Topotecan in Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Analysis by Chemotherapy Cohort of the Randomized Phase III AURELIA Trial
resolves10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1443
BAY 43-9006 Exhibits Broad Spectrum Oral Antitumor Activity and Targets the RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Involved in Tumor Progression and Angiogenesis
resolves10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30142-X
Bevacizumab and platinum-based combinations for recurrent ovarian cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa1611310
Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
resolves10.3390/ijms20215369
BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: Clinical and Molecular Insights
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa1500596
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
resolves10.2217/fon-2018-0070
Avelumab (Anti-PD-L1) in Platinum-Resistant/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: JAVELIN Ovarian 200 Phase III Study Design
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37_ref2
no DOI — not checked10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37_ref13
no DOI — not checked10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37_ref16
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37)