Reference health

Systematic reappraisal of species in <i>Phoma</i> section <i>Paraphoma</i> , <i>Pyrenochaeta</i> and <i>Pleurophoma</i>

CiteStamped reference-health badge
17/17 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-19

Every reference with a DOI or an arXiv id in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

22 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and this line says so.

The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3852/08-199
DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of<i>Phoma</i>section<i>Peyronellaea</i>and multiple taxonomic novelties
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025607
Loculoascomycete origins and evolution of filamentous ascomycete morphology based on 18S rRNA gene sequence data
resolves10.1080/15572536.2003.11833191
Molecular phylogeny of<i>Leptosphaeria</i>and<i>Phaeosphaeria</i>
resolves10.1017/S0953756203007731
Neophaeosphaeria and Phaeosphaeriopsis segregates of Paraphaeosphaeria
resolves10.1016/j.mycres.2009.01.002
Molecular phylogeny of Phoma and allied anamorph genera: Towards a reclassification of the Phoma complex
resolves10.1017/S0953756297004206
Pyrenochaeta dolichi: an example of a confusing species
resolves10.1007/S10267-008-0409-5
Bambusicolous fungi in Japan (7): a new coelomycetous genus, Versicolorisporium
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees
resolves10.1079/DFB/20056401508
<i>Phoma septicidalis</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].
resolves10.1016/S0007-1536(75)80163-X
Pyrenochaeta unguis-hominis sp.nov. on human toe-nails
resolves10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7
Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences
resolves10.1139/b02-111
<i>Setomelanomma holmii</i> (Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae) on living spruce twigs in Europe and North America
resolves10.1017/S0953756298006972
Small subunit ribosomal RNA gene phylogeny of several loculoascomycetes and its taxonomic implications
resolves10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species
resolves10.1111/j.1439-0329.1975.tb00463.x
Über Pyrenochaeta parasitica spec. nov., die Nebenfruchtform von Herpotrichia parasitica (Hartig) E. Rostrup (= Trichosphaeria parasitica Hartig
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
AMPLIFICATION AND DIRECT SEQUENCING OF FUNGAL RIBOSOMAL RNA GENES FOR PHYLOGENETICS
resolves10.3767/003158509X427808
Multiple <i>Didymella</i> teleomorphs are linked to the <i>Phoma clematidina</i> morphotype
The 22 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Crous PW. 2008. Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma , a complex genus of major quarantine significance. Fungal Divers 31:1–18.
no DOI — not checkedBarr ME. 1987. Prodomus to class Loculoascomycetes . Amherst, Massachussetts: Hamilton I. Newell Inc.
no DOI — not checkedBoerema GH. 1993. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (coelomycetes) II. Section Peyronellaea . Persoonia 15:197–221.
no DOI — not checked——— 1997. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (coelomycetes) V. Subdivision of the genus in sections. Mycotaxon 64:321–333.
no DOI — not checked———, de Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Hamers MEC. 2004. Phoma identification manual. Differentiation of specific and infra-specific taxa in culture. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. 470 p.
no DOI — not checked———, Dorenbosch MMJ. 1973. The Phoma and Ascochyta species described by Wollenweber and Hochapfel in their study on fruit-rotting. Stud Mycol 3:1–55.
no DOI — not checked———, Loerakker WM, Hamers MEC. 1996. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) III2. Misapplications of the type species-name and the generic synonyms of section Plenodomus (Excluded species). Persoonia 16:141–190.
no DOI — not checkedBorelli D. 1959. Pyrenochaeta romeroi n.sp. Dermatologia-Venezolana 1:325–327.
no DOI — not checked——— 1976. Pyrenochaeta mackinnonii nova species agente de micetoma. Castellania 4:227–234.
no DOI — not checkedCrous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, Samson RA. 2009. Fungal biodiversity. CBS Laboratory Manual Series. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures.
no DOI — not checked———, Boerema GH. 2002. Contributions toward a monograph of Phoma (coelomycetes) VII. Section Paraphoma : taxa with setose pycnidia. Persoonia 17: 541–561.
no DOI — not checkedDorenbosch MMJ. 1970. Key to nine ubiquitous soilborne Phoma -like fungi. Persoonia 6:1–14.
no DOI — not checkedHansen HN. 1929. Etiology of the pink-root disease of onions. Phytopathology 19:691–704.
no DOI — not checkedLeuchtmann A. 1984. Über Phaeosphaeria Miyake und andere bitunicate Ascomyceten mit mehrfach querseptierten Ascosporen. Sydowia 37:75–194.
no DOI — not checkedLinder DH. 1944. I. Classification of the marine fungi. Farlowia 1:401–467.
no DOI — not checkedMorgan-Jones G, White JF. 1983. Studies in the genus Phoma III. Paraphoma , a new genus to accommodate Phoma radicina . Mycotaxon 18:57–65.
no DOI — not checkedSchneider R. 1979. Die Gattung Pyrenochaeta De Notaris. Mitt Biol Bundesanst Land- Forstw 189:1–73.
no DOI — not checkedSivanesan A. 1984. The bitunicate Ascomycetes and their anamorphs. Liechtenstein: J. Cramer, Vaduz. 701 p.
no DOI — not checkedSutton BC. 1980. The coelomycetes. Fungi imperfecti with pycnidia, acervuli and stromata. Kew, UK: CMI. 696 p.
no DOI — not checkedSwofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b 10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
no DOI — not checkedvan der Aa HA, Noordeloos ME, de Gruyter J. 1990. Species concepts in some larger genera of the coelomycetes. Stud Mycol 32:3–19.
no DOI — not checked———, Vanev S. 2002. A revision of the species described in Phyllosticta . Utrecht, the Netherlands: CBS. 510 p.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.

checked 2026-10-19 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/09-240"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/09-240/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/09-240/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/09-240)