Reference health
<i>Corneroboletus</i> , a new genus to accommodate the southeastern Asian <i>Boletus indecorus</i>
5 of 44 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-10-09
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
30 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and this line says so.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/3761848
does not resolve to a known work10.3852/mycologia.98.6.971
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/3755085
does not resolve to a known work10.3852/mycologia.99.2.310
does not resolve to a known work10.3852/11-376.
The 39 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/1522-239X(200205)113:1/2<30::AID-FEDR30>3.0.CO;2-D
Retiboletus, a new genus for a species-complex in the Boletaceae producing retipolides
resolves10.3852/09-288
Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms
resolves10.1016/j.ympev.2010.10.004
Molecular phylogenetics of porcini mushrooms (Boletus section Boletus)
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026007
Usefulness of RNA polymerase II coding sequences for estimation of green plant phylogeny
resolves10.1093/nar/gkh340
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
resolves10.1007/s00572-009-0287-5
Ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with two species of Kobresia in an alpine meadow in the eastern Himalaya
resolves10.2307/3760972
Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences from 38 Recognized Species of Suillus sensu lato: Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Implications
resolves10.1007/s13225-011-0109-x
The sequestrate genus Rosbeeva T.Lebel & Orihara gen. nov. (Boletaceae) from Australasia and Japan: new species and new combinations
resolves10.1007/s13225-011-0096-y
Zangia, a new genus of Boletaceae supported by molecular and morphological evidence
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092
Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit
resolves10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014
Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales)
resolves10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.024
Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylogeny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi)
resolves10.3852/08-168
Taxonomic reconsideration of a sequestrate fungus,<i>Octaviania columellifera</i>, with the proposal of a new genus,<i>Heliogaster</i>, and its phylogenetic relationships in the Boletales
resolves10.1016/S0007-1536(81)80013-7
A natural arrangement of the Boletales, with reference to spore morphology
resolves10.1017/S0953756203007901
Xerocomus cisalpinus sp. nov., and the delimitation of species in the X. chrysenteron complex based on morphology and rDNA-LSU sequences
resolves10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03813.x
Fruiting body and soil rDNA sampling detects complementary assemblage of Agaricomycotina (Basidiomycota, Fungi) in a hemlock‐dominated forest plot in southern Ontario
resolves10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species
resolves10.1017/S0953756201004877
The relationships and possible distributional patterns of boletes in south-east Asia
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
AMPLIFICATION AND DIRECT SEQUENCING OF FUNGAL RIBOSOMAL RNA GENES FOR PHYLOGENETICS
resolves10.1006/mpev.2000.0812
Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Relationships of Eastern Asian and Eastern North American Disjunct Suillus Species (Fungi) as Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal RNA ITS Sequences
resolves10.1007/s13225-011-0121-1
Molecular techniques revolutionize knowledge of basidiomycete evolution
resolves10.5248/117.19
Type studies on two species of Phylloporus (Boletaceae, Boletales) described from southwestern China
The 30 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBinderMFischerM. 1997. Molekularbiologische Charakterisierung der Gattungen Boletellus Murr. und Xerocomus Quél.: Xerocomus pruinatus (Fr. & Hök) Quél. und verwandte Arten. Boll Gruppo Micol G Bresadola 40:79–90.
no DOI — not checkedBinderMBeslH. 2000. 28S rDNA sequence data and chemotaxonomical analyses on the generic concept of Leccinum (Boletales). In: Associazone Micologica Bresadola, ed. Micologia 2000. Brescia, Italy: Grafica Sette. p 75–86.
no DOI — not checkedBreitenbachJKränzlinF. 1991. Pilze der Schweiz, Band 3: Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze 1 Teil. Luzern, Switzerland: Verlag Mykologia. 350 p.
no DOI — not checkedBresinskyABeslH. 2003. Beiträge zu einer Mykoflora Deutschlands-Schlüssel zur Gattungsbestimmung der Blätter-, Leisten-und Röhrenpilze mit Literaturhinweisen zur Artbestimmung. Regensburger Mykol Schriften 11:1–236.
no DOI — not checkedChiuWF. 1970. Phylloporus Quél. and Paxillus Fr. in Malaya and Borneo. Nova Hedwig 20:793–822.
no DOI — not checkedCornerEJH. 1972. Boletus in Malaysia. Singapore: Government Printer. 263 p.
no DOI — not checkedDesjardinDEBinderMRoekringSFlegelT. 2009. Spongiforma, a new genus of gasteroid boletes from Thailand. Fungal Divers 37:1–8.
no DOI — not checkedDoyleJJDoyleJL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf material. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15.
no DOI — not checkedDrehmelDJamesTVilgalysR. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and biodiversity of the boletes. Fungi 1:17–23.
no DOI — not checkedHallTA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analyses program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98.
no DOI — not checkedHorakE. 2005. Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze in Europa. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. 67 p.
no DOI — not checkedHorakE. 2011. Revision of Malaysian species of Boletales s.l. (Basidiomycota) described by E.J.H. Corner (1972, 1974). Malayan For Rec 51:1–283.
no DOI — not checkedLiTHSongB. 2003. Boletes species known from China. Guizhou Sci 21:78–86.
no DOI — not checkedLiYCYangZLTolgorB. 2009. Phylogenetic and biogeographic relationships of Chroogomphus species as inferred from molecular and morphological data. Fungal Divers 38:85–104.
no DOI — not checkedMasseeGE. 1909. Fungi exotici IX. Bull Misc Inform Kew. p 204–209.
no DOI — not checkedMasseeGE. 1914. Fungi exotici XVII. Bull Misc Inform Kew. p 72–76.
no DOI — not checkedNelsenSF. 2010. Bluing components and other pigments of boletes. Fungi 3:11–14.
no DOI — not checkedNylanderJAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2.3. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University.
no DOI — not checkedPatouillardNTBakerCF. 1918. Some Singapore Boletinae. J Straits Branch Roy Asiat Soc 78:68–72.
no DOI — not checkedSchrankFvonP. 1789. Baierische Flora 2:1–670.
no DOI — not checkedScopoliJA. 1772. Flora carniolica 2:1–496.
no DOI — not checkedSingerR. 1962. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 2nd ed. Weinheim, Germany: J Cramer. 915 p.
no DOI — not checkedSingerR. 1975. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 3th ed. Vaduz, Lichtenstein: J Cramer. 729 p.
no DOI — not checkedSingerR. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 4th ed. Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books. p 752–775.
no DOI — not checkedSwoffordDL. 2004. PAUP* 4.01: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
no DOI — not checkedTengSC. 1963. Fungi of China. Beijing: Science Press. p 542–558.
no DOI — not checkedWenHA. 1985. New species and new records of genus Boletellus from China. Mycosystema 4:222–226.
no DOI — not checkedZangM. 2006. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum. Vol. 22. Boletaceae I. Beijing: Science Press. p 1–215.
no DOI — not checkedZangMChenCMSittigulC. 1999. Some new and interesting taxa of Boletales from tropical Asia. Fung Sci 18:19–25.
no DOI — not checkedZangMYangZLZhangY. 2006. On an undescribed Sinoboletus from China. Mycosystema 25:366–367.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.
checked 2026-10-09 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/11-326"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/11-326/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3852/11-326)