At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 44 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s11557-020-01619-yRhodocybe-Clitopilus clade (Entolomataceae, Basidiomycota) in the Dominican Republic: new taxa and first reports of Clitocella, Clitopilus, and Rhodocybe for Hispaniola
resolves10.5962/p.416720The genus Rhodocybe: new combinations and a revised key to section Rhodophana in North America
resolves10.1007/BF02183055Thoughts on the processes that maintain local species diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi
resolves10.1038/nmeth.2109jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing
resolves10.1093/nar/gkh340MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
resolves10.1017/S095375620200641XPhylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences
resolves10.11646/phytotaxa.666.1.1Two new species and a new record of Entolomatoid fungi (Entolomataceae, Agaricales) from Pakistan
resolves10.3852/13-270Toward a stable classification of genera within the Entolomataceae: a phylogenetic re-evaluation of the Rhodocybe-Clitopilus clade
resolves10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales)
resolves10.1007/s11557-016-1165-0Clitopilus reticulosporus, a new species with unique spore ornamentation, its phylogenetic affinities and implications on the spore evolution theory
resolves10.3767/003158513X673521Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses reveal species limits, phylogeographic patterns, and evolutionary histories of key morphological traits in <i>Entoloma</i> (<i>Agaricales</i>, <i>Basidiomycota</i>)
resolves10.3767/003158514X681774<i>Entoloma</i> subgenus <i>Leptonia</i> in boreal-temperate Eurasia: towards a phylogenetic species concept
resolves10.3390/jof9050537Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Cystolepiota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales): New Species, New Combinations and Notes on the C. seminuda Complex
resolves10.1080/0028825X.2024.2381734Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant‐associated fungi
resolves10.1093/sysbio/sys029MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space
resolves10.3906/bot-1607-1Two new Rhodocybe species (sect. Rufobrunnea, Entolomataceae)from the East Black Sea coast of Turkey
resolves10.47371/mycosci.2023.03.001<i>Rhodocybe subasyae</i>, a new species of <i>Rhodocybe</i> sect. <i>Rufobrunnea </i>(<i>Entolomataceae, Agaricales</i>) from northeast China
resolves10.1038/s41598-025-08102-2Morphology and phylogeny reveal two new species and a new geographical record of Agaricus sect. Rubricosi (Agaricales) from West Bengal, India
resolves10.1002/nzb2.70022<i>Limacella bajaurensis</i>
sp. nov. (Amanitaceae), from Bajaur, Pakistan
resolves10.1002/nzb2.70076<i>Calocybe barangensis</i>
sp. nov (Lyophyllaceae), from Bajaur, Pakistan
resolves10.11646/phytotaxa.267.1.1Rhodocybe tugrulii (Agaricales, Entolomataceae), a new species from Turkey and Estonia based on morphological and molecular data, and a new combination in Clitocella (Entolomataceae)
resolves10.1007/s12228-011-9187-zClitopilus canariensis (Basidiomycota, Entolomataceae), a new species in the C. nitellinus-complex (Clitopilus subg. Rhodophana) from the Canary Islands (Spain)
resolves10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation
resolves10.3389/fmicb.2023.1118525Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses revealed four new species of Agaricales from China
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBas C (1969) Morphology and subdivision of Amanita and a monograph of its section Lepidella. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 5(4): 285–573.
no DOI — not checkedCarlo P (2024) Rhodophana almae-lunae una nuova specie del gruppo di Rhodophana nitellina. Rivista di Micologia 66(3): 195–208.
no DOI — not checkedGminder A (2020) Rhodophana stangliana und Squamanita contortipes, zwei selten berichtete mykoparasitische basidiomyzeten aus der gattung squamanita sl. Zeitschrift für Mykologie 86(1): 23–34.
no DOI — not checkedHall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
no DOI — not checkedKühner R (1971) Agaricales de la zone alpine. Rhodophyllacées. Caractéres généraux et grandeslignes de la classification. Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 87(1): 10–13
no DOI — not checkedMiller MA, Holder MT, Vos R, Midford PE Liebowitz T, Chan L, Hoover P, Warnow T (2010) The Cipres Portals. Cipres. https://www.phylo.org/sub-sections/portal [Accessed 10 Mar 2024]
no DOI — not checkedMunsell (1975) Munsell soil color charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Corporation. Baltimore (Maryland): U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
no DOI — not checkedMusumeci E (2020) Una nueva especie de Rhodophana (antes Rhodophana) para el territorio alsaciano. Errotari 2020: 224–236.
no DOI — not checkedRambaut A, Drummond AJ (2012) FigTree version 1.4. 0. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.