Reference health
Evaluation of an onsite integrated hybrid PV-Wind power plant
21/21 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
33 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/pip.2950
Solar photovoltaics demand for the global energy transition in the power sector
resolves10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1
Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps
resolves10.1002/pip.3189
Impact of weighted average cost of capital, capital expenditure, and other parameters on future utility‐scale PV levelised cost of electricity
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.159
A comparative analysis of electricity generation costs from renewable, fossil fuel and nuclear sources in G20 countries for the period 2015-2030
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.013
United States cost of military force projection in the Persian Gulf, 1976–2007
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.057
Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity
resolves10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.010
Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.026
Grid matching of large-scale wind energy conversion systems, alone and in tandem with large-scale photovoltaic systems: An Israeli case study
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.070
Investigating the impact of wind–solar complementarities on energy storage requirement and the corresponding supply reliability criteria
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118466
Baseload electricity and hydrogen supply based on hybrid PV-wind power plants
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.052
The optimum mix of electricity from wind- and solar-sources in conventional power systems: Evaluating the case for New York State
resolves10.1039/C7EE03029K
Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power in the United States
resolves10.3934/energy.2020.5.749
Exploiting wind-solar resource complementarity to reduce energy storage need
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.069
Curtailment-storage-penetration nexus in the energy transition
resolves10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.064
Increasing climate-related-energy penetration by integrating run-of-the river hydropower to wind/solar mix
resolves10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.087
Solar–hydro hybrid power station as a way to smooth power output and increase water retention
resolves10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.021
A hybrid algorithm based optimization on modeling of grid independent biodiesel-based hybrid solar/wind systems
The 33 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked1. Agora Energiewende, 2018. Die Energiewende im Stromsektor: Stand der Dinge 2017, Berlin. Available from: www.agora-energiewende.de.
no DOI — not checked2. Teske S (Ed.) (2019) <i>Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals-Global and Regional 100% Renewable Energy Scenarios with Non-energy GHG Pathways for +1.5 ℃ and +2 ℃</i>. Springer Open, Cham.
no DOI — not checked3. [IEA]-International Energy Agency, 2011. Solar Energy Perspectives, IEA, Paris. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-energy-perspectives.
no DOI — not checked8. [IEA-PVPS]-International Energy Agency Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme, 2019. Trends 2019 in Photovoltaic Applications, St. Ursen. Available from: www.iea-pvps.org.
no DOI — not checked10. [EWG]-Energy Watch Group, 2013. Fossil and Nuclear Fuels-the Supply Outlook, Berlin. Available from: www.energywatchgroup.org.
no DOI — not checked11. Brown TW, Bischof-Niemz T, Blok K, et al. (2018) Response to 'Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems'. <i>Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev</i> 92: 434-847.
no DOI — not checked13. Krewitt W, Schlomann B (2006) Externe Kosten der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien im Vergleich zur Stromerzeugung aus fossilen Energieträgern, study on behalf of Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit.
no DOI — not checked15. Stern N (Ed.) (2006) <i>Stern Review on the economics of climate change</i>, HM Treasury, London.
no DOI — not checked17. Guenther B, Karau T, Kastner EM, et al. (2011) Berechnung einer risikoadaequaten Versicherungspraemie zur Deckung der Haftpflichtrisiken, die aus dem Betrieb von Kernkraftwerken resultieren, Versicherungsforen Leipzig, Leipzig.
no DOI — not checked18. Bundesnetzagentur and Bundeskartellamt, 2018. Monitoringbericht 2018, Bonn. Available from: www.bundeskartellamt.de.
no DOI — not checked19. Sandia National Labs, 2016. Electricity Storage Handbook, SAND2016-9180, Albuquerque. Available from: www.sandia.org.
no DOI — not checked21. Sterner M (2009) Bioenergy and renewable power methane in integrated 100% renewable energy systems. PhD thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kassel.
no DOI — not checked23. Deutsche Bank DB Research, 2012. State-of-the-art electricity storage systems-Indispensable elements of the energy revolution, Frankfurt a.M. Available from: www.dbresearch.com.
no DOI — not checked24. [EPRI]-Electric Power Research Institute, 2012. Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options-A White Paper Primer on Applications Costs and Benefits, Palo Alto. Available from: https://www.epri.com/.
no DOI — not checked25. Gerlach AK, Stetter D, Schmid J, et al. (2011) PV and Wind Power-Complementary Technologies. <i>30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress</i>, <i>Kassel</i> 2: 1972-1978.
no DOI — not checked28. Slusarewicz JH, Cohan DS (2018) Assessing solar and wind complementarity in Texas, <i>Renewables: Wind, Water, Sol</i> 5: 7.
no DOI — not checked29. Monforti F, Huld T, Bódis K, et al. (2014) Assessing complementarity of wind and solar resources for energy production in Italy. A Monte Carlo approach. <i>Renewable Energy</i> 63: 576-586.
no DOI — not checked31. Bozonnat C, Schlosser CA (2014) Characterization of Solar Power Resources in Europe and Assessing Benefits of Co-location with Wind Power Installations. MIT Join Program on the science and Policy of global change, Report No. 268, Cambridge.
no DOI — not checked32. [UNEP]-United Nations Environmental Programs, 2018. Global trends in Renewable Energy investment 2018, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management-UNEP centre, Frankfurt. Available from: https://bit.ly/2ZZqkiE.
no DOI — not checked33. [AECOM]-AECOM Australia Pty Ltd., 2016. Co-location investigation-A study into the potential for co-locating wind and solar farms in Australia, ABN 35 932 927 899, Sydney. Available from: https://bit.ly/3j1gt4T.
no DOI — not checked37. Fthenakis V, Adam A, Perez M, et al. (2014) Prospects for photovoltaics in sunny and arid regions: A solar grand plan for Chile. <i>40th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference</i>, Denver, June 9-13.
no DOI — not checked39. Klonari V, Fraile D, Rossi R, et al. (2019) Exploring the Viability of hybrid wind-solar power plants. <i>4<sup>th</sup> International Hybrid Power Systems Workshop</i>, Crete, May 22-23.
no DOI — not checked40. [MNRE]-Ministry of New & Renewable Energy, 2018. National Wind-Solar Hybrid Policy, No. 238/78/2017-Wind, MNRE, New Delhi. Available from: https://bit.ly/2OpfRaQ.
no DOI — not checked41. PV Magazine (2017) Siemens Gamesa to build India's first hybrid wind-solar farm, Berlin, September 26. Available from: https://bit.ly/2ZpluMH.
no DOI — not checked42. PV Magazine (2018) Wind giant Vestas taps solar storage markets for hybridization drive, Berlin, February 8. Available from: https://bit.ly/32dWQjZ.
no DOI — not checked43. [ARENA]-Australian Renewable Energy Agency, 2016. Australian first project to harness sun, wind and batteries, ARENA, Canberra. Available from: https://bit.ly/2WdAc7G.
no DOI — not checked44. Piguet G, Maza JL, Incalza A, et al. (2013) Combining solar photovoltaic power plants and wind farms: An innovative approach to the synergetic design. <i>Proceedings of the 28th EU PVSEC,</i> Paris.
no DOI — not checked45. PVSyst, 2013. PVSyst Software, [online]. Available from: www.pvsyst.com.
no DOI — not checked46. Schuhmacher J (2012) INSEL 8 tutorial Integrated Simulation Environment Language, doppelintegral GmbH, Stuttgart.
no DOI — not checked47. Stetter D (2012) Enhancement of the REMix energy system model: Global renewable energy potentials, optimized power plant siting and scenario validation. PhD thesis, Faculty of Energy-, Process- and Bio-Engineering, University of Stuttgart.
no DOI — not checked49. Gasch R, Twele J (2012) <i>Wind Power Plants: Fundamentals Design Construction and Operation</i>. 2nd ed., Springer, Heidelberg.
no DOI — not checked52. Solomon AA, Faiman D, Meron G (2011) Appropriate storage for high-penetration grid-connected photovoltaic plants. <i>Energy Policy</i> 40: 335-344.
no DOI — not checked57. PV Magazine, 2020. South Korea's largest hybrid solar-wind project, Berlin, August 27. Available from: https://bit.ly/3hTldaS.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3934/energy.2020.5.988"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3934/energy.2020.5.988/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.3934/energy.2020.5.988)