Reference health

Actual evapotranspiration and precipitation measured by lysimeters: a comparison with eddy covariance and tipping bucket

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2145-2015
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 46 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-23

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1256/smsqj.44706
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
A new look at the statistical model identification
resolves10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.008
On the discrepancy between eddy covariance and lysimetry-based surface flux measurements under strongly advective conditions
resolves10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007
A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method
resolves10.1007/s00271-009-0179-7
Evaluating eddy covariance cotton ET measurements in an advective environment with large weighing lysimeters
resolves10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.11.032
The wind-induced loss of thunderstorm precipitation measurements
resolves10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.001
Evaluating eddy covariance method by large-scale weighing lysimeter in a maize field of northwest China
resolves10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.023
Can weighing lysimeter ET represent surrounding field ET well enough to test flux station measurements of daily and sub-daily ET?
resolves10.1016/0168-1923(86)90068-7
Effect of soil temperature on evapotranspiration by C3 and C4 grasses
resolves10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.008
The footprint concept in complex terrain
resolves10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1
Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements
resolves10.1890/06-0922.1
THE ENERGY BALANCE CLOSURE PROBLEM: AN OVERVIEW
resolves10.1175/2011BAMS3130.1
Results Of A Panel Discussion About The Energy Balance Closure Correction For Trace Gases
resolves10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.005
Energy balance closure of eddy-covariance data: A multisite analysis for European FLUXNET stations
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-27281-3_53
A Data Acquisition System Based on Outlier Detection Method for Weighing Lysimeters
resolves10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
Regression and time series model selection in small samples
resolves10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.11.010
Comparison of Noah simulations with eddy covariance and soil water measurements at a winter wheat stand
resolves10.1029/2005WR004055
Contribution of dew to the water budget of a grassland area in the Netherlands
resolves10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.019
Estimating random errors of eddy covariance data: An extended two-tower approach
resolves10.1023/A:1018991015119
An Analytical Footprint Model For Non-Neutral Stratification
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.1993.tb03245.x
PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT BIASES IN THE UNITED STATES<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/hyp.7059
A comparison of three methods for determining vineyard evapotranspiration in the arid desert regions of northwest China
resolves10.1016/j.agwat.2006.05.017
An evaluation of two hourly reference evapotranspiration equations for semiarid conditions
resolves10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.006
A strategy for quality and uncertainty assessment of long-term eddy-covariance measurements
resolves10.1002/jpln.200625002
Measurement of dew, fog, and rime with a high‐precision gravitation lysimeter
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.005
Systematic correction of precipitation gauge observations using analyzed meteorological variables
resolves10.1007/BF00122754
Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems
resolves10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0450:EOWIEO>2.0.CO;2
Estimation of Wind-Induced Error of Rainfall Gauge Measurements Using a Numerical Simulation
resolves10.1002/jpln.201200342
Interpretation of lysimeter weighing data affected by wind
resolves10.5194/hess-18-1189-2014
Separating precipitation and evapotranspiration from noise – a new filter routine for high-resolution lysimeter data
resolves10.2136/vzj2012.0139
Calibration of a Novel Low‐Cost Soil Water Content Sensor Based on a Ring Oscillator
resolves10.1021/ac60214a047
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
resolves10.1007/BF00164332
Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluxes
resolves10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.061
Estimating Precipitation and Actual Evapotranspiration from Precision Lysimeter Measurements
resolves10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.002
Using watershed water balance to evaluate the accuracy of eddy covariance evaporation measurements for three semiarid ecosystems
resolves10.1016/0169-8095(95)00066-6
Adjustment of tipping-bucket precipitation gauge measurements
resolves10.1002/wea.548
A history of rain gauges
resolves10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00123-4
Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland
resolves10.1007/s11267-007-9172-4
Modular Design of Field Lysimeters for Specific Application Needs
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2009)135:2(235)
Noise Reduction Methods for Weighing Lysimeters
resolves10.1016/j.agwat.2006.10.008
A processing method for weighing lysimeter data and comparison to micrometeorological ETo predictions
resolves10.2478/johh-2013-0021
Comparison of real evapotranspiration measured by weighing lysimeters with simulations based on the Penman formula and a crop growth model
resolves10.1023/A:1018966204465
Sonic Anemometer Tilt Correction Algorithms
resolves10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00199-4
A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance
resolves10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0054:AONSNP>2.0.CO;2
Accuracy of NWS 8" Standard Nonrecording Precipitation Gauge: Results and Application of WMO Intercomparison
resolves10.2136/vzj2010.0139
A Network of Terrestrial Environmental Observatories in Germany
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAllen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 9, 300, 1998.
no DOI — not checkedBrutsaert, W.: Hydrology: An Introduction/Wilfried Brutsaert, 5th print. Edn., Univ. Press, Cambridge, XI, 605 pp., 2010.
no DOI — not checkedDeutscher Wetterdienst (DWD): Richtlinie für automatische Klimastationen, Offenbach am Main, 1993.
no DOI — not checkedGoodison, B. E., Louie, P. Y. T., and Yang, D.: The WMO solid precipitation measurement intercomparison. World Meteorological Organization-Publications-WMO TD, 65-70, 1997.
no DOI — not checkedKohnke, H., Davidson, J. M., and Dreibelbis, F. R.: A survey and discussion of lysimeters and a bibliography on their construction and performance, U. S. Govt. print. off., Washington, D.C., p. 68, 1940.
no DOI — not checkedMauder, M. and Foken, T.: Documentation and Instruction Manual of the Eddy-Covariance Software Package TK3. Arbeitsergebnisse/Universität Bayreuth, Abteilung Mikrometeorologie, 2011.
no DOI — not checkedRichter, D.: Ergebnisse methodischer Untersuchungen zur Korrektur des systematischen Messfehlers des Hellmann-Niederschlagsmessers Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, 194, 1995.
no DOI — not checkedSevruk, B.: Methodische Untersuchungen des systematischen Messfehlers der Hellmann-Regenmesser im Sommerhalbjahr in der Schweiz. Mitteilungen Nr. 52, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie, ETH Zürich, 299 Book pp., 1981.
no DOI — not checkedSevruk, B.: Wind induced measurement error for high-intensity rains. Proc. International Workshop on Precipitation Measurement, WMO Tech. Document 328, St. Moritz, Switzerland, 199–204, 1989.
no DOI — not checkedZenker, T.: Verdunstungswiderstände und Gras- Referenz- verdunstung: Lysimeteruntersuchungen zum Penman-Monteith-Ansatz im Berliner Raum, PhD thesis, Berlin University of Technology, Germany, 2003.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5194/hess-19-2145-2015"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5194/hess-19-2145-2015/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5194/hess-19-2145-2015/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5194/hess-19-2145-2015)