Reference health

Arthrobotrys latispora, a new nematode-trapping fungus from southwest China

https://doi.org/10.5248/117.29
CiteStamped reference-health badge
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/15572536.2006.11832753
Phylogenetics and evolution of nematode-trapping fungi (Orbiliales) estimated from nuclear and protein coding genes
resolves10.5248/109.247
Arthrobotrys nonseptata, a new anamorph from an Orbilia species
resolves10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00422-0
Phylogenetic relationships of Pestalotiopsis and allied genera inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences and morphological characters
resolves10.1139/b72-220
Nematophagous Hyphomycetes: <i>Arthrobotrys anomala</i> sp. nov.
resolves10.1139/b79-170
Nematophagous fungi: a new <i>Arthrobotrys</i> with nonseptate conidia
resolves10.1139/b77-115
A new nematode-trapping hyphomycete and a reevaluation of <i>Dactylaria</i> and <i>Arthrobotrys</i>
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models
resolves10.1080/00275514.1997.12026750
Castor, Pollux and life histories of fungi
resolves10.1080/00275514.1995.12026584
Two <i>Arthrobotrys</i> anamorphs from <i>Orbilia auricolor</i>
resolves10.1080/00275514.1994.12026433
<i>Orbilia fimicola</i> , a nematophagous discomycete and its <i>Arthrobotrys</i> anamorph
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedR45_220_547
no DOI — not checkedR45_349_516
no DOI — not checkedR45_72_391
no DOI — not checkedR46_124_252
no DOI — not checkedR46_72_200
no DOI — not checkedR46_114_74
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5248/117.29"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5248/117.29/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5248/117.29/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5248/117.29)