Reference health
Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate
2 of 76 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-14
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a publisher retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
Reference list from the work’s DataCite record — the related works its depositor declared as citations.
20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2777/620649
does not resolve to a known work10.2200/s00334ed1v01y201102wbe001
The 74 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1038/sdata.2016.18
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
resolves10.3897/biss.3.37080
Zenodo, an Archive and Publishing Repository: A tale of two herbarium specimen pilot projects
resolves10.1093/nar/gkl971
The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data
resolves10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003
Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects
resolves10.1007/s10209-016-0475-y
A comparison of research data management platforms: architecture, flexible metadata and interoperability
resolves10.1515/9783598441844
National Bibliographies in the Digital Age: Guidance and New Directions
resolves10.1007/s00267-014-0258-2
Why is Data Sharing in Collaborative Natural Resource Efforts so Hard and What can We Do to Improve it?
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414
Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data
resolves10.1093/gigascience/giz095
Sharing interoperable workflow provenance: A review of best practices and their practical application in CWLProv
resolves10.5281/zenodo.1445817
DataCrate: a method of packaging, distributing, displaying and archiving Research Objects
resolves10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.002
ELIXIR: a distributed infrastructure for European biological data
resolves10.1080/14490854.2020.1796500
Digital crowdsourcing and public understandings of the past: citizen historians meet Criminal Characters
resolves10.1371/journal.ppat.1008643
No more business as usual: Agile and effective responses to emerging pathogen threats require open data and open analytics
resolves10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x
The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines
resolves10.5281/zenodo.4705078
EOSC-Life Methodology framework to enhance reproducibility within EOSC-Life
resolves10.5281/zenodo.4605654
Implementing FAIR Digital Objects in the EOSC-Life Workflow Collaboratory
resolves10.3390/publications8020021
FAIR Digital Objects for Science: From Data Pieces to Actionable Knowledge Units
resolves10.48546/workflowhub.workflow.56.1
Protein Ligand Complex MD Setup tutorial using BioExcel Building Blocks (biobb) (jupyter notebook)
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.3000099
Enabling precision medicine via standard communication of HTS provenance, analysis, and results
resolves10.1109/ieeestd.2020.9094416
IEEE Standard for Bioinformatics Analyses Generated by High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) to Facilitate Communication
resolves10.5281/zenodo.4633732
Describing and packaging workflows using RO-Crate and BioCompute Objects
resolves10.1109/bigdata.2016.7840618
I'll take that to go: Big data bags and minimal identifiers for exchange of large, complex datasets
resolves10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_15
Machine-Actionable Data Management Plans: A Knowledge Retrieval Approach to Automate the Assessment of Funders’ Requirements
resolves10.4126/frl01-006423289
Towards semantic representation of machine-actionable Data Management Plans
resolves10.1182/blood-2017-03-735654
The NCI Genomic Data Commons as an engine for precision medicine
resolves10.1045/january2011-crosas
The Dataverse Network®: An Open-Source Application for Sharing, Discovering and Preserving Data
resolves10.1093/nar/gkq429
myExperiment: a repository and social network for the sharing of bioinformatics workflows
resolves10.1016/j.future.2019.03.046
Enabling FAIR research in Earth Science through research objects
resolves10.3233/apc200107
Toward Enabling Reproducibility for Data-Intensive Research Using the Whole Tale Platform
resolves10.1109/escience.2019.00068
Application of BagIt-Serialized Research Object Bundles for Packaging and Re-Execution of Computational Analyses
resolves10.1016/j.future.2017.01.012
Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities
resolves10.3389/fninf.2017.00069
Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Reuse, Replicate: Transforming Code into Scientific Contributions
resolves10.1007/s41019-017-0050-4
Robust Cross-Platform Workflows: How Technical and Scientific Communities Collaborate to Develop, Test and Share Best Practices for Data Analysis
resolves10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7
Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/btx192
BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization
resolves10.1093/nar/gky379
The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://ptsefton.com/2021/04/07/rdmpic/
no DOI — not checkedISBN: 978-1-315-35114-8
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3714
no DOI — not checkedISBN: 978-1-56308-191-0
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://cameronneylon.net/blog/as-a-researcher-im-a-bit-bloody-fed-up-with-data-management/
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://ocfl.io/1.0/spec/
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-08-31/HttpRange-14.html
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://github.com/duraspace/pcdm/wiki
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://iswc2017.semanticweb.org/paper-579/
no DOI — not checkedarXiv: arXiv:2105.07028v1
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/REC-vocab-dcat-2-20200204/
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://icl.utk.edu/ctwatch/quarterly/articles/2007/08/interoperability-for-the-discovery-use-and-re-use-of-units-of-scholarly-communication/
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-523/Newman.pdf
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://web.archive.org/web/20091115080336/http%3a%2f%2frdf.myexperiment.org/ontologies
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/metagenomics/umgs_analyses/
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://github.com/Finn-Lab/MGS-gut
no DOI — not checkedURL: https://twitter.com/soilandreyes/status/1250721245622079488
no DOI — not checkedURL: http://repscience2016.research-infrastructures.eu/img/CaroleGoble-ReproScience2016v2.pdf
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5281/zenodo.5146228"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5281/zenodo.5146228/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.5281/zenodo.5146228)