Reference health
New technologies and jobs in Europe
25/25 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
resolves10.1093/cjres/rsz022
The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand
resolves10.1257/jep.29.3.3
Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation
resolves10.1257/aer.103.5.1553
The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market
resolves10.1162/003355303322552801
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.06.004
From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes
resolves10.1257/pandp.20181019
What Can Machines Learn and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?
resolves10.1257/pandp.20181021
A Method to Link Advances in Artificial Intelligence to Occupational Abilities
resolves10.5465/AMBPP.2019.140
The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Human Labor: An Ability-Based Approach
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
resolves10.1257/aer.104.8.2509
Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring
resolves10.1111/ecot.12145
Educational upgrading, structural change and the task composition of jobs in Europe
resolves10.2307/2118494
How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984-1989
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.01.004
Labor market polarization, the decline of routine work, and technological change: A quantitative analysis
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAgrawal, Ajay, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics ofartificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.
no DOI — not checkedDavis, Steven, John Haltwanger and Scott Schuh. (1996). Job creation and job destruction. MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedFord, Martin. (2015). Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future. Basic Books.
no DOI — not checkedInternational Labour Organization. (2010). “ISCO international standard classification ofoccupations”. https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/
no DOI — not checkedSusskind, Daniel. (2020). A world without work: Technology, automation and how we should respond. Penguin.
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). “Standard occupational classification. Crosswalks betweenthe 2010 SOC and systems used by other federal and international statistical agencies”. https://www.bls.gov/soc/soccrosswalks.htm
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.53479/33414"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.53479/33414/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.53479/33414)