Reference health
Les nouvelles formes d’organisation du travail
1 of 35 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-08
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1994.9412271803
The 34 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2524274
The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8543.1995.tb00444.x
Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and If So, Who Benefits?
resolves10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS
resolves10.2307/256389
INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING AND JOB DESIGN: MODERATING EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL INERTIA.
resolves10.2307/256713
MODES OF THEORIZING IN STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: TESTS OF UNIVERSALISTIC, CONTINGENCY, AND CONFIGURATIONS. PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS.
resolves10.2307/2095101
The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields
resolves10.1080/713769651
High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: the strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships
resolves10.2307/2696137
Explaining Variation in Workplace Restructuring: The Role of Local Union Capabilities
resolves10.2307/2525245
"Flexible" Workplace Practices: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey
resolves10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00317.x
Editors’ Introduction: The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers
resolves10.2307/2534771
Old Dogs and New Tricks: Determinants of the Adoption of Productivity- Enhancing Work Practices
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
resolves10.1177/1059601195202004
Organization Culture, Distribution and Amount of Control, and Perceptions of Quality
resolves10.2307/2696072
Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare
resolves10.1111/1467-8543.00178
Employees and High‐Performance Work Systems: Testing inside the Black Box
resolves10.7202/000026ar
Labour Markets, Flexible Specialization and the New Microcorporatism The Case of Canada’s Major Appliance Industry
resolves10.1002/hrm.3930340208
Human resource management innovations: Determinants of their adoption and implementation
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAntony, R.N. et V. Govindarajan. 2001. Management Control Systems. 10e édition. New-York : McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
no DOI — not checkedAppelbaum, E., T. Bailey, P. Berg et A. Kalleberg. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage : Why High-Performance Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY : ILR Press.
no DOI — not checkedBalkin, D.B. et G.D. Markman. 1998. « The Determinants of Team Rewards in Entrepreneurial Firms ». Note de recherche, 26.
no DOI — not checkedBergeron, F., S. Rivard et L. Raymond. 1998. « Determinants of Business Process Reengineering Success in Small and Large Enterprises : An Empirical Study in the Canadian Context ». Journal of Small Business Management, janvier, 72–85.
no DOI — not checkedBoxall, P. et J. Purcell. 2003. Strategy and Human Resource Management. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
no DOI — not checkedCaudron, S. 1993. « Are Self-directed Teams Right for Your Company? ». Personnel Journal, décembre, 76–84.
no DOI — not checkedCotton, J. 1993. Employee Involvement. Newburry Park, CA : Sage.
no DOI — not checkedCrozier, M. et E. Friedberg. 1977. L’acteur et le système. Paris : Seuil.
no DOI — not checkedDavid, A. 2002. « Direction, conception et recherche en sciences de gestion ». Revue française de gestion, 3–4 (139), 173–185.
no DOI — not checkedEPOC Research Group. 1997. New Forms of Work Organizations : Results of a Survey of Direct Employee Participation in Europe. Dublin : European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
no DOI — not checkedEtzioni, A. 1961. Comparative Analysis of Complex Organization. New York : Free Press.
no DOI — not checkedFrench, W.L. et C.H. Bell. 1973. Organization Development. Englewood Cliff, NJ : Prentice Hall.
no DOI — not checkedGrant, M. et B. Lévesque. 1997. « Aperçu des principales transformations des rapports du travail dans les entreprises : le cas québécois ». Nouvelles formes d’organisation du travail : études de cas et analyses comparatives. M. Grant, P.R. Bélanger et B. Lévesque, dir. Montréal : L’Harmattan, 221–277.
no DOI — not checkedHuselid, M.A. et B.L. Rau. 1996. « The Determinants of High Performance Work Systems : Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis ». Manuscrit.
no DOI — not checkedMillward, N., A. Bryson et J. Forth. 2000. All Change at Work : British Employment Relations 1980–1998 as Portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey Series. London : Routledge.
no DOI — not checkedMintzberg, H. 1994. « Pièges et illusions de la planification stratégique ». Gestion, 19 (1), 66–74.
no DOI — not checkedOsterman, P. 1994b. « Supervision, Discretion, and Work Organization ». The American Economic Review, 84 (2), 380–384.
no DOI — not checkedPorter, M.E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York : Free Press.
no DOI — not checkedTessier, R. et Y. Tellier. 1990. Changement planifié et développement des organisations. Montréal : Éditions de l’I.F.G.
no DOI — not checkedTrist, E.L. et K.W. Bamforth. 1951. « Quelques conséquences sociales et psychologiques de la méthode des longs fronts de taille dans l’extraction du charbon ». s.l. : s.n., 207–256.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.7202/018125ar"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.7202/018125ar/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.7202/018125ar)