On the public citation graph

Fair Value Measurement

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119448723

0 signed · 6 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4627319openalex-extracted

Real Effects of Subjectivity in Measuring Fair Values

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119613794.refsopenalex-snapshot

References

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24891/ia.21.9.1086openalex-snapshot

The use of fair value to measure accounting items: Practical issues

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2025.05.042openalex-snapshot

Fair value accounting in the context of Irving Fisher’s normative theory

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5937/jouproman2301022popenalex-snapshot

IMPLICATIONS OF APPLYING FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING TO MODERN FINANCIAL REPORTING

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7176/rjfa/11-22-12openalex-snapshot

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Excess Earnings Method for Valuing Backlog

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.