On the public citation graph

Reducing tunnel vision with a pen‐and‐paper tool for the weighting of criminal evidence

https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1504
0 signed · 53 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1130openalex-snapshot
When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1432openalex-snapshot
The ‘elasticity’ of criminal evidence: a moderator of investigator bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.570openalex-snapshot
Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.116openalex-snapshot
Blindness to alternative scenarios in evidence evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.19openalex-snapshot
Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: the need for cognitive closure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.010openalex-snapshot
Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020278620751openalex-snapshot
"He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.60.3.215openalex-snapshot
On the Psychology of Confessions: Does Innocence Put Innocents at Risk?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231openalex-snapshot
Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.499openalex-snapshot
Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.7.2.91openalex-snapshot
Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175openalex-snapshot
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017881openalex-snapshot
Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401038openalex-snapshot
Information Relevance, Working Memory, and the Consideration of Alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12004openalex-snapshot
A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111565openalex-snapshot
The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420047523.ch6openalex-snapshot
Bounded Rationality and Criminal Investigations

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4749359openalex-extracted
Efficiency and Safety of 3D Reconstruction in Crime Scenes Investigation: Evaluating Impacts, Benefits, and Limitations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3738openalex-snapshot
Test of the analysis of competing hypotheses in legal decision‐making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70258openalex-snapshot
Investigating Workplace Investigators: Bias Mitigation With Fact‐Checking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1631openalex-snapshot
The effect of confession evidence on conviction, and considering alternative scenarios as remedy in a sample of police officers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95663-9_1openalex-snapshot
Alibis and Corroborators: Psychological, Criminological, and Legal Perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44931-4_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44931-4_13openalex-snapshot
Conclusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66329-1_4openalex-snapshot
3D Reconstruction in Crime Scenes Investigation: Impacts, Benefits, and Limitations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09425-8openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Biases in Criminal Case Evaluation: A Review of the Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-026-09847-wopenalex-snapshot
Facilitating Falsification: Devil’s Advocacy in Dutch Police Investigations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.03.011openalex-snapshot
Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics: Problems, challenges, and the way forward
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301317openalex-snapshot
Strategies for safeguarding examiner objectivity and evidence reliability during digital forensic investigations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100562openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the validity of testimony: The role of the order of evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.06.003openalex-snapshot
PRECEPT-4-Justice: A bias-neutralising framework for digital forensics investigations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000416openalex-snapshot
Allegiance Bias in Statement Reliability Evaluations Is Not Eliminated by Falsification Instructions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2022.2114476openalex-snapshot
Legal psychologists as experts: guidelines for minimizing bias
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2023.2236274openalex-snapshot
The use of alternative scenarios in assessing the reliability of victims’ statements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2026.2739982openalex-snapshot
Artificial intelligence in criminal investigation: effects of large language model consultation on confirmation bias in a simulated investigation game
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904452openalex-snapshot
Accountability in legal decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf014openalex-snapshot
Evidence-based evaluations of criminal evidence—the role of evaluation structures for guilt determinations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.40openalex-snapshot
Prosecutorial Misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-07-2025-0078openalex-snapshot
Mind over matter: can training shift investigative mindset and investigative interview planning?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12172openalex-snapshot
Context effect and confirmation bias in criminal fact finding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.14openalex-snapshot
Digital Forensic Logistics: The Basics of Scientific Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x20982328openalex-snapshot
Structured Hypothesis Development in Criminal Investigation: A method aimed at providing a broad and objective starting point for a criminal investigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x211038888openalex-snapshot
Have you considered the opposite? A debiasing strategy for judgment in criminal investigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10887679231225410openalex-snapshot
Investigative Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis of Homicide Detectives’ Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00560-yopenalex-snapshot
Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327036openalex-snapshot
What happened and what proves you wrong? Combatting confirmation bias in police investigations through evidence reconstruction and falsification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14201/cp.32165openalex-snapshot
Análisis e implementación de estrategias para prevenir o atenuar la “contaminación” cognitiva en la obtención, análisis e interpretación de las pruebas científico-forenses en el proceso penal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0102openalex-snapshot
Schuldig bei Verdacht? Prüfstrategien in Beschuldigtenvernehmungen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i4.10489openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Bias Affecting Decision-Making in the Legal Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20190618naqopenalex-snapshot
The influence of guilt presumptive language on investigative interview outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20210114emopenalex-snapshot
Facilitating falsification in legal decision making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33612/diss.563508244openalex-snapshot
(Im)probable stories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.85648openalex-snapshot
Exploratory study of a system to reduce information overload and tunnel vision in homicide investigations
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.