On the public citation graph
Someone's loss might be your gain: A case of negative results publications in science
0 signed · 12 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1044>3.0.co;2-1openalex-snapshot
The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1047>3.0.co;2-topenalex-snapshot
Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7openalex-snapshot
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638openalex-snapshot
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3050879openalex-snapshot
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102openalex-snapshot
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3546355openalex-snapshot
The "File Drawer Problem" of Non-Significant Results: Does It Apply to Biological Research?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2500701openalex-extracted
Zum Ausbleiben der Veröffentlichung von negativen Ergebnissen in der wissenschaftlichen Fachliteratur - Eine ökonomische Analyse von Schäden, Ursachen und Gegenmaßnahmen (About the Absence of Publishing Negative Results in Scientific Literature - An Economic Analysis of Damages, Causes and…
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1438openalex-snapshot
Dissimulate or disseminate? A survey on the fate of negative results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-s18-s6openalex-snapshot
Privacy-preserving search for chemical compound databases
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.