On the public citation graph

Linnaeus, the essentialism story, and the question of types

0 signed · 60 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003456.pub2openalex-snapshot
Species Problem – A Philosophical Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12211openalex-snapshot
§193 and §246 of Philosophia botanica do not support that Linnaeus was a “typologist”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00129174openalex-snapshot
The type-concept in zoology during the first half of the nineteenth century
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9897-zopenalex-snapshot
Objectivity, Historicity, Taxonomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9161-0openalex-snapshot
Identification Keys, the “Natural Method,” and the Development of Plant Identification Manuals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9410-yopenalex-snapshot
Suppressing Synonymy with a Homonym: The Emergence of the Nomenclatural Type Concept in Nineteenth Century Natural History
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.010openalex-snapshot
Collection and collation: theory and practice of Linnaean botany
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.09.006openalex-snapshot
“A temporary oversimplification”: Mayr, Simpson, Dobzhansky, and the origins of the typology/population dichotomy (part 1 of 2)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8486(01)00010-3openalex-snapshot
Cain on Linnaeus: the scientist-historian as unanalysed entity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8486(03)00026-8openalex-snapshot
On the origin of the typological/population distinction in Ernst Mayr’s changing views of species, 1942–1959
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511498459openalex-snapshot
The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511762222openalex-snapshot
The Species Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139164856openalex-snapshot
The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889703000929openalex-snapshot
Joining Lapland and the Topinambes in Flourishing Holland: Center and Periphery in Linnaean Botany
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024139523966openalex-snapshot
Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/13458-000openalex-snapshot
The principles of science: A treatise on logic and scientific method.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2013.783109openalex-snapshot
Systems and How Linnaeus Looked at Them in Retrospect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03745484309445300openalex-snapshot
XXXIX.—Series of Propositions for rendering the Nomenclature of Zoology uniform and permanent, being the Report of a Committee for the consideration of the subject appointed by the British Association for the Advancement of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17496970902981694openalex-snapshot
The Origins of ‘Natural Kinds’: Keeping ‘Essentialism’ at Bay in the Age of Reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/427306openalex-snapshot
Type Specimens and Scientific Memory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/100.2.507openalex-snapshot
The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/xv.60.314openalex-snapshot
THE EFFECT OF ESSENTIALISM ON TAXONOMY—TWO THOUSAND YEARS OF STASIS (I)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1445openalex-snapshot
Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomenclature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1958.tb00819.xopenalex-snapshot
LOGIC AND MEMORY IN LINNAEUS'S SYSTEM OF TAXONOMY.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.2011.02022.xopenalex-snapshot
Making sense of essentialism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8.198.513openalex-snapshot
The Method of Types
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.23.010178.000515openalex-snapshot
A Historical Perspective on the Impact of the Type Concept on Insect Systematics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9783486723045openalex-snapshot
Geschichte der Botanik
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520411777openalex-snapshot
Reason and Experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520945074openalex-snapshot
Species
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1216447openalex-snapshot
ON NOMENCLATURE: THE “TYPE‐METHOD”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1217764openalex-snapshot
ON NOMENCLATURE: THE “TYPE‐METHOD”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1219852openalex-snapshot
THE TYPIFICATION OF LINNAEAN PLANT NAMES: A PROJECT OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1554959openalex-snapshot
Why do we name organisms? Some reminders from the past
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2399589openalex-snapshot
A History of Botanical Nomenclature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2411603openalex-snapshot
The Background of Linnaeus's Contributions to the Nomenclature and Methods of Systematic Biology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2411606openalex-snapshot
Linnaeus and the Development of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2651620openalex-snapshot
Linnaeus: Nature and Nation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2738551openalex-snapshot
Linnaeus, The Man and His Work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2803954openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.238.6.413openalex-snapshot
Types in modern taxonomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[2:lbwne]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
LINNAEUS'S BIOLOGY WAS NOT ESSENTIALIST1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009450-4openalex-snapshot
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon their History
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16106459openalex-snapshot
ON THE DESCRIPTIVE METHOD OF LINNAEUS (Continued)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16149858openalex-snapshot
ON THE DESCRIPTIVE METHOD OF LINNAEUS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16215017openalex-snapshot
ON THE TYPIFICATION OF LINNEAN SPECIES AS ILLUSTRATED BY POLYGALA VERTICILLATA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201647141openalex-snapshot
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon their History
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-5657openalex-snapshot
The development of biological systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, nature, and the natural system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-1518openalex-snapshot
Darwin's dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-3408openalex-snapshot
Milestones in systematics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.105348openalex-snapshot
History of botany (1530-1860)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.37652openalex-snapshot
Philosophia botanica : in qua explicantur fundamenta botanica cum definitionibus partium, exemplis terminorum, observationibus rariorum, adjectis figuris aeneis / Caroli Linnæe.

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3897/nhcm.2.144386zenodo-depositor-declared
Facing the taxonomic impediment — a reassessment of Merulanella Verhoeff, 1926 (Oniscidea, Armadillidae) through historical specimens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/njz2.70038openalex-snapshot
Taxonomic Species and Conservation: A Coleopterists’ View
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80384-0_6openalex-snapshot
A Stable and Convenient System Emerges: Linnaeus
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88723-9_2openalex-snapshot
The Role of Typology and Constraints in the Formation of the Natural System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88723-9_6openalex-snapshot
Criteria for Recognizing Units of Evolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.24.04ragopenalex-snapshot
Exploring terminological processes in the 19th century
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2025.2582385openalex-snapshot
Methodological Habitus: Complicating Categories, Taxonomies, and Scientism in Archaeology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2026.2675558openalex-snapshot
Translation mining: An AI-driven taxonomy of eighteenth-century Anglo-French translation practices
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.