On the public citation graph
An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision
0 signed · 67 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_27openalex-snapshot
On the Qualitative Comparison of Sets of Positive and Negative Affects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0028174openalex-snapshot
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(86)90035-6openalex-snapshot
Weighted minimum and maximum operations in fuzzy set theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021603608656openalex-snapshot
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1207.4130openalex-snapshot
Using arguments for making decisions: A possibilistic logic approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1302.3560openalex-snapshot
Arguing for Decisions: A Qualitative Model of Decision Making
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/int.20307openalex-snapshot
On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.486openalex-snapshot
Towards Automating Decision Aiding Through Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_27openalex-snapshot
On the Qualitative Comparison of Sets of Positive and Negative Affects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_15openalex-snapshot
Argumentation for Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_4openalex-snapshot
Bipolar abstract argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_7openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35921-7_9openalex-snapshot
Exploring the Mobile Usability of Argumentative Dialogue Systems for Opinion Building
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-85432-7_10openalex-snapshot
Comparing decisions on the basis of a bipolar typology of arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-85432-7_13openalex-snapshot
Constraints and Preferences: Modelling Frameworks and Multi-agent settings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-85432-7_3openalex-snapshot
An overview of bipolar qualitative decision rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_19openalex-snapshot
A Viewpoint Approach to Structured Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_9openalex-snapshot
Fuzzy Argumentation System for Decision Support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10975-6_1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation-Based Group Decision Support for Collectivist Communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73817-6_5openalex-snapshot
Bipolar Preference Problems: Framework, Properties and Solving Techniques
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74970-7_55openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty in Bipolar Preference Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_29openalex-snapshot
Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_55openalex-snapshot
Algebraic Structures for Bipolar Constraint-Based Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_12openalex-snapshot
Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29966-7_8openalex-snapshot
Reasoning about Interest-Based Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_30openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Based Dynamic Multiple Criteria Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0475-4openalex-snapshot
Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-010-0147-3openalex-snapshot
Multiple criteria decision aiding: a dialectical perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9435-9openalex-snapshot
A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1774-4openalex-snapshot
Value-based argumentation for policy decision analysis: methodology and an exploratory case study of a hydroelectric project in Québec
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-011-9274-2openalex-snapshot
Argumentation-Based Qualitative Preference Modelling with Incomplete and Uncertain Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9050-6openalex-snapshot
Qualitative Heuristics For Balancing the Pros and Cons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-019-00173-3openalex-snapshot
A decision-making approach where argumentation added value tackles social choice deficiencies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006openalex-snapshot
Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.008openalex-snapshot
A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.048openalex-snapshot
Improving argumentation-based recommender systems through context-adaptable selection criteria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.040openalex-snapshot
Using argumentation to manage users’ preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105112openalex-snapshot
An approach to generalizing the handling of preferences in argumentation-based decision-making systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888913000325openalex-snapshot
A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.1966986openalex-snapshot
Using Argumentation to Solve Conflicting Situations in Users’ Preferences in Ambient Assisted Living
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09528130903010212openalex-snapshot
From soft constraints to bipolar preferences: modelling framework and solving issues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2010.524288openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty in bipolar preference problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.670751openalex-snapshot
Utility conditionals as consequential arguments: A random sampling experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2012.663539openalex-snapshot
Processing natural language arguments with the platform
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2014.6891601openalex-snapshot
A quantitative preference-based structured argumentation system for decision support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2020.3042740openalex-snapshot
Using Argumentation to Obtain and Explain Results in a Decision Support System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01123.xopenalex-snapshot
Behavioral Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018361openalex-snapshot
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3053371openalex-snapshot
Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-Enabled Collective Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v29i4.2202openalex-snapshot
Preferences in Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2520openalex-snapshot
On the Qualitative Comparison of Decisions Having Positive and Negative Features
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.20868/upm.thesis.39170openalex-snapshot
Application of Agent Technology for Fault Diagnosis of Telecommunication Networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2200/s00372ed1v01y201107aim014openalex-snapshot
A Short Introduction to Preferences: Between Artificial Intelligence and Social Choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.210203.001openalex-snapshot
Value-Based Reasoning in Autonomous Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3115/1626481.1626491openalex-snapshot
Analyzing the explanation structure of procedural texts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3115/1693756.1693767openalex-snapshot
A conceptual and operational model for procedural texts and its use in textual integration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/ia-180002openalex-snapshot
A meta-argumentation approach for the efficient computation of stable and preferred extensions in dynamic bipolar argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32657/10356/155849openalex-snapshot
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for healthcare decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4000/corela.234openalex-snapshot
Vers la construction de descriptions argumentées d’un accident de la route : analyse de diverses stratégies argumentatives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/ijaeis.2018070104openalex-snapshot
A Decision Support Tool for Agricultural Applications Based on Computational Social Choice and Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1207.1363openalex-snapshot
A unified setting for inference and decision: An argumentation-based approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5753/wesaac.2016.33218openalex-snapshot
Protocolo para diálogos argumentativos no auxílio da decisão consensual em sistemas multiagentes
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.