On the public citation graph

Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578
0 signed · 16 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119792161.ch3openalex-snapshot
Deep Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04662-9_9openalex-snapshot
Computational Argumentation for Supporting Learning Processes: Applications and Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: Context and Recent Developments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.05.003openalex-snapshot
Classical logic, argument and dialectic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010openalex-snapshot
Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.09.002openalex-snapshot
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.03.006openalex-snapshot
A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888906001044openalex-snapshot
Towards an argument interchange format
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2013.869765openalex-snapshot
Constructing argument graphs with deductive arguments: a tutorial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3017679openalex-snapshot
Using Argumentation to Improve Classification in Natural Language Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14198/jopha.2009.3.3.02openalex-snapshot
A formal model of persuasion dialogs for interactions among argumentative software agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22436/jmcs.010.04.05openalex-snapshot
Negotiation Planning Of Autonomous Agents In Multi-agent Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040585openalex-snapshot
Linked Argumentation Graphs for Multidisciplinary Decision Support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4995/thesis/10251/12497openalex-snapshot
Case-Based Argumentation in Agent Societies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/d2044eb5z9b08z4406z83f9z96e209f3d016openalex-snapshot
Mécanismes de négociation multilatérale pour la prise de décision collective
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.