On the public citation graph
Towards an exact philosophy of action
0 signed · 24 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7openalex-snapshot
Word Meaning and Montague Grammar
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370324openalex-snapshot
Application of modal logic to programming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1976.27openalex-snapshot
Semantical consideration on floyo-hoare logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1980.35openalex-snapshot
Process logic: Expressiveness, decidability, completeness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1964.tb00868.xopenalex-snapshot
ACTA PHILOSOPHICA FENNICA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1982.tb00480.xopenalex-snapshot
On the logic of theory change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2271594openalex-snapshot
A logical analysis of some value concepts
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7046-1_1openalex-snapshot
Krister Segerberg’s Philosophy of Action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2919-2_6openalex-snapshot
Chisholm’s Theory of Action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00873199openalex-snapshot
Intentions, actions and routines: A problem in Krister Segerberg's theory of action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01028969openalex-snapshot
Process and Action: Relevant Theory and Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9025-xopenalex-snapshot
How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9157-xopenalex-snapshot
Evaluating Practical Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316340554openalex-snapshot
Goal-based Reasoning for Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12043openalex-snapshot
TWO INTUITIONS ABOUT FREE WILL: ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND INTENTIONAL ENDORSEMENT
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12550openalex-snapshot
Two intuitions about free will—Some afterthoughts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2011.003openalex-snapshot
A norm-giver meets deontic action logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0001openalex-snapshot
Communication as commitment sharing: speech acts, implicatures, common ground
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.